A group of scientists at England’s Durham University have produced research suggesting that fewer people would eat meat if meat products contained warning labels like those seen on cigarette packs.
Led by PhD candidate Jack Hughes, the team of scientists “split 1,001 meat-eating adults into four groups, and showed each group pictures of hot meat, fish, vegetarian and vegan canteen-style meals – ranging from burgers to quiche – with either a health warning label, a climate warning label, a pandemic warning label, or no label at all,” according to The Guardian.
The pandemic warning reportedly produced the best results, with the health warning coming in second place and the climate warning coming in third place. However, when asked directly, the participants claimed they were most moved by the climate change warning.
— BPR (@BIZPACReview) April 23, 2023
This is relevant because the U.K.’s Climate Change Committee has claimed the nation needs to reduce its meat consumption by 20 percent by 2030 and 50 percent by 2050 in order to meet its climate change goals.
“When you combine that with the fact that high meat intake is linked to lots of health issues, and the way that we currently farm, or certainly some of the most common ways of farming, are also very heavily linked to the potential of pandemic outbreaks, it becomes clear that there are multiple reasons why the current way that we eat meat is maybe not the best way to do it,” Hughes said.
“Reaching net zero is a priority for the nation and the planet. As warning labels have already been shown to reduce smoking as well as drinking of sugary drinks and alcohol, using a warning label on meat-containing products could help us achieve this if introduced as national policy,” he added.
That said, Hughes and his team aren’t necessarily advocating for anything but rather just offering suggestions, he claimed.
“It is not up to me to speculate or recommend how companies and restaurants use this research. If these were to be implemented in the real world, what our research shows is that putting these warning labels alongside meat options when people are making decisions might be an effective way to reduce the amount of meat people are choosing,” he told Time magazine.
Responding to the study, critics were nevertheless incensed at even the thought of scientists telling them to not eat meat:
How about a counter-label that says “Listening to so-called scientists is bad for your health.”
— DMarie (@SaguaroSis) November 11, 2023
Probably the same scientists that keep wanting the public to get vax boosted and parroted “safe and effective”
— RockyWon (@54321_Goooo) November 10, 2023
What is it going to take for people to realize these ‘scientists’ – AREN’T?!?
Will they have to say the best cure for a headache is to chop off your head?
The warning is bad enough – knowing the droolers will nod along sagely is far worse
— Shan (@shanprevails) November 11, 2023
Do “scientists” know how much we, the public, distrust,them?
Do “scientists” know how sick of their self serving bullshit we, the public, are?
Do “scientists” know that doing the polar opposite of what they recommend has been found to be far better for the public’s health?
— BeFrank (@FrankLaird16) November 12, 2023
“Scientists” employed by leftist organizations want this. pic.twitter.com/6nhVCypIxN
— Publius Hamilton (@soonerjoe1962) November 11, 2023
However, those concerned about so-called climate change reacted quite differently, with many salivating at the idea of this proposed “solution” reducing meat consumption.
As the data suggests, some will while some will resist. This will also work more towards reduction than ethically motivated abolition.
— (@ChaosReign1066) November 3, 2023
Anything that will make people stop and think, even if some ignore it, it’s the drip drip and constant reminders that help the message get through. It’s another tool to use.
— Joy Vyner (@VynerJoy) November 3, 2023
Love this idea. There will of course be many who choose to bury their heads in the sand but anything to open more eyes to the damage we’re causing can only be a good thing.
— Jin Sane (@Jin_Sane) November 3, 2023
Every single avenue must be explored to #EndAnimalAgriculture. Lives are at stake. The level of human misery we will reach in the next couple of decades is also in large part a function of our treatment of other animals on Earth.
— Michel BouchardⓋ (@MichelBouchardo) November 4, 2023
This enthusiasm stems from their die-hard belief that meat consumption somehow hurts the planet.
“Livestock farming is estimated to be responsible for up to 15% of all greenhouse gas emissions arising from human activity,” The Conversation claims.
Warning labels would reportedly also be beneficial in other ways.
“Warning labels on meat packaging or menus could highlight evidence that a relatively high intake of meat products increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke, and according to one study, dementia. There is also evidence of red and processed meat consumption leading to a greater risk of developing type 2 diabetes, obesity and multiple cancers,” The Conversation argues.
“Or, these labels could warn people that meat farming dramatically increases the risk of a pandemic. Outbreaks of zoonotic diseases (which jump from animals to humans, such as COVID-19 or swine flu) are more likely to emerge where animals are kept in extremely close contact. And as farms expand into wild land, species deprived of habitats migrate into towns and cities where encounters with people are more likely.”
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- Rolling Stone sparks firestorm for celebrating death of Henry Kissinger with ‘hateful headline’ - November 30, 2023
- ‘Can this be America?’ Trump calls out judge’s wife moments after gag order is reinstated - November 30, 2023
- FBI agent is latest armed carjacking victim in crime-ridden D.C. - November 30, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.