A Texas Department of Public Safety official said Thursday that the police were justified in waiting for backup instead of storming the classroom where school mass shooter Salvador Ramos had barricaded himself inside, because had they gone in after him without backup, “they could have been shot, they could have been killed.”
Speaking on CNN, DPS Lt. Chris Olivarez argued that had this occurred, Ramos would have been free to roam the rest of the school and kill more people.
“In the active shooter situation, you want to stop the killing, you want to preserve life. But also, one thing that, of course, the American people need to understand is that officers are making entry into this building. They do not know where the gunman is. They are hearing gunshots. They are receiving gunshots,” he said.
“At that point, if they proceeded any further not knowing where the suspect was at, they could have been shot, they could have been killed, and at that point that gunman would have had an opportunity to kill other people inside that school.”
Instead, Ramos remained inside the classroom effectively unchallenged as he killed everybody inside it.
Olivarez’s justification triggered massive backlash on social media:
He said that out loud on TV?
Yes you could get shot. I thought that is why you tough guys signed up to be cops? So you could face danger and risk your life to protect people, right?
Oh wait no, it was to bully defenseless people, that’s right!
— PCR RitesGood (@pcrritesgood) May 27, 2022
If cops are not willing to risk getting shot to protect innocent lives, we don’t need them. I understand the reluctance to get shot. That’s one of the reasons I’m not a cop. You can’t insist that you deserve respect for taking risks, and then refuse to take those risks.
— Matthew Prorok (@MJtheProphet) May 27, 2022
Well thank god they’re safe. I mean 18 kids died, but the cops lived. Whew.
— Brian (@Trizellini) May 26, 2022
Next firemen won’t enter a building fire because they might get burned
— JoeBrooklyn (@JoeBrooklynNY) May 26, 2022
Not available for comment: the 10 year olds who were shot
— Pandasquare (@Pandasquare1) May 26, 2022
Earlier during the same segment, Olivarez admitted that officers had arrived at the school “within minutes” but again defended their decision to abstain from storming the classroom, arguing in part that they’d been busy evacuating everybody else from the building as they contained Ramos inside the room.
“Officers were in that building within minutes. They maintained their presence inside that school. … Also in addition to that, other officers arrived and they were able to evacuate other children as well and teachers. We have to understand, too, it was a full school. I mean, they were trying to evacuate as many people as possible because in an active shooter situation your focus is to stop the killing and preserve life,” he said.
“At that point, they had the suspect contained inside the classroom. If those officers weren’t there, if they didn’t maintain their presence, there is a good chance that gunman could have made it to other classrooms and commit more killings.”
Texas authorities are facing heavy backlash over both their questionable decision-making and also their lack of transparency and changing stories.
Following the shooting, Texas authorities gave the impression that one of their officers had engaged Ramos right before he entered the school but backed off after sustaining a gunshot wound.
Outrage at reports cops engaged gunman before he entered Texas school, border patrol agent rushed in later https://t.co/ibJMIFybWP
— American Wire News (@americanwire_) May 25, 2022
Yet on Thursday, their story suddenly changed, and they said that no officer had been present and that Ramos had simply strolled into the school unchallenged via an unlocked back door.
“We know for a fact that there was not a school resource officer on site assigned to the school at that particular time. What we do know is that there was a school resource officer who responded to the scene,” Olivarez said during an appearance late Thursday on “Fox News at Night.”
“Initially, when this first took place … the initial reports that we received was that the school resource officer encountered the gunman and there was an exchange of gunfire. We’ve been able to confirm that was not the case. There was no encounter whatsoever with that initial resource officer and the gunman.”
Yesterday, Texas DP Director Steven McCraw said a school resource officer “engaged” the shooter.
Today, DPS officials said there was no officer at the school and that the shooter walked through an unlocked back door without being confronted by anybody.
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) May 26, 2022
Olivarez also offered an explanation for a viral video showing police officers standing outside Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, barring parents from going inside.
As the video went video, it prompted accusations from parents that the police had done “nothing” as their children were slaughtered.
“In an active situation like that, we have multiple officers arriving. There was officers inside the school. There was officers on the opposite side of the school, breaking windows and trying to evacuate teachers,” Olivarez said.
“And the officers you see on the video … those were officers who were setting up a perimeter, trying to keep people from going into that school, because again, it’s still an active situation. We don’t know where exactly that gunman is, if he’s alive and what he’s doing.”
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- WaPo columnist draws scrutiny for claiming it’s not ‘Christ-like’ for minority women to be unable to abort - July 2, 2022
- Woke education agendas pop up overseas: One mom reveals her fight against school’s radical teachings - July 2, 2022
- TikTok influencer with over 250,000 followers charged for allegedly exposing herself to minors at pool - July 2, 2022
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.