Controversy is brewing over Kamala Harris’s new security detail.
An unmarked LAPD vehicle was spotted outside the Brentwood, LA, home of the failed presidential candidate after President Donald Trump revoked her extended Secret Service protection.
At least 11 elite “Metro Division” officers were reportedly “pulled from working cases” and assigned to protect Harris 24/7, reported the New York Post.
California has now pulled police officers off cases to provide unneeded security for Kamala Harris.
The only security she needs is to escort her to jail for her treason of importing millions of illegals.
Other than that, nobody cares about Kamala.pic.twitter.com/AMO87UpfO9
— Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) September 4, 2025
Democrats accused Trump of “retaliation” after he revoked Harris’ extended detail, despite six months being the standard time allotment for former vice presidents.
“This is another act of revenge following a long list of political retaliation in the form of firings, the revoking of security clearances, and more,” LA Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement.
“This puts the former Vice President in danger, and I look forward to working with the Governor to make sure Vice President Harris is safe in Los Angeles.”
Governor Gavin Newsom is reportedly in talks with the California Highway Patrol to provide Harris with additional protection, reported Fox 11.
X users had plenty to say about the latest report, and questioned why taxpayers should be on the hook:
So an LA police officers are pulled to protect a woman nobody cares about and leaves more vulnerable blacks unprotected.
Governor Newsom truly believes “Black Lives Don’t Matter”.
— LMGTS (Let me get this straight) (@RichardAubrey11) September 4, 2025
Good lord. She can afford private security. The taxpayers in CA are already the most burdened in the entire country.
She can pick up her own bills.— ACO (@ACOnationalist) September 4, 2025
Why does she need security? No one wants to get 10 feet from her. No one wants to remember she’s even on earth. Those poor police officers. I hope they get hazard pay.
— Creature of Habit2 (@CreatureHabit2) September 4, 2025
This will make her more unlikable if she ever runs for office again. Rules for thee.
Tax payers don’t want their money spent on a millionaire politician who can easily pay for her own security.— colomba (@colomba212) September 4, 2025
She should pay for private security. Why is this so difficult to fathom.
— James V. Barcia (@jamesbarcia) September 4, 2025
Biden tried to give Kamala an extra 6 months of Secret Service protection.
Trump denied it.
So Democrats in California give her free security anyway. https://t.co/WmmeQyeMZD
— john jackson (@pvtjokerus) September 4, 2025
Take that, Trump! (And screw you, taxpayers.)
- ‘Respect!’ Intense footage shows young fisherman save great white shark off California coast - April 3, 2026
- ‘Make it make sense!’ Distraught young mother’s economic plight hits a nerve - April 3, 2026
- Arrested head of San Fran homeless initiative paid her son $10k to make 5 slides, prosecutors say - April 2, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.