Fallout from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s (D-NY) “stumbles” in Munich breached containment as even corporate media slammed the suspected White House hopeful as not ready for primetime.
Call it a warning shot or a signal to back off indefinitely, the typical echo chamber of the left appeared burnt out from handholding gaffetastic, word salad-producing politicians on the world stage. As such, the multiple missteps at the Munich Security Conference found the New York Times and the Washington Post among those openly criticizing the darling socialista.
During Monday’s installment of “The Morning Meeting,” host and political analyst Mark Halperin commented specifically on the Times’ coverage as he said, “I think, you know, giving AOC a slot may go down in history as one of the bigger mistakes she’s ever made if she wants to be president.”
He went on to add, “It takes a major screw-up for the New York Times to put in their story about AOC that she had, I think they said it was a ‘stumble’ or something. Had to be a really bad stumble.”
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s gaffe-ridden appearance at the Munich Security Conference “may go down in history as one of the bigger mistakes she’s ever made if she wants to be president,” says @MarkHalperin. “It takes a major screw up for the New York Times to put in their story… pic.twitter.com/DKEEGtbeZD
— 2WAY (@2waytvapp) February 17, 2026
Making note of her “stumbles” in the headline, the Times reported on Ocasio-Cortez’s response to a question about whether the U.S. should respond militarily to aid Taiwan in case of aggression from China, “Questioned about whether the United States should send troops to defend Taiwan if China invaded the island, she stalled for roughly 20 seconds before offering a substantive response.”
“‘I think that, uh, this is such a, a — you know, I think that — this is a, um — this is of course, a, uh, a very longstanding, um, policy of the United States,’ Ms. Ocasio-Cortez said, before saying that the country should try to avoid reaching that point with China in the first place,” the Squad member was quoted as saying.
Halperin continued his critique, “… you cannot go to these things having gone to a tutorial, and have a briefing book and memorize your answers. If she doesn’t feel in her bones what America’s role should be vis-à-vis Taiwan, it’s never going to work.”
“Now, she could have done a better job memorizing the answer they gave her, but that’s what I think is so instructive here about what happened. She has no feeling in her bones about Taiwan. She just thought, ‘Well, I’ll go with a memorized answer.’ And I don’t think even the Democratic Party will make somebody the nominee if they can’t answer that question,” he added.
Of course, Taiwan wasn’t Ocasio-Cortez’s only stumbling block, as the lawmaker also took heat for her claim that Venezuela is south of the equator and failing to recognize that Spaniards were responsible for introducing horses to Mexico. The latter had come from a failed attempt to score points on Secretary of State Marco Rubio over his “pure appeal to Western culture.”
“My favorite part was when [he said] that American cowboys came from Spain. And I believe the Mexicans and descendants of African enslaved people would like to have a word on that,” said Ocasio-Cortez.
For their part, the Washington Post’s editorial board reported that the congresswoman “appeared out of depth as she tried to graft her class-warfare politics onto foreign policy.”
The editorial board wrote, “The message to her European audience was, in short: The West is very bad, but the U.S. and Europe should remain allies anyway. She said that the U.S. had enabled genocide in Gaza and that President Donald Trump was treating Latin America as America’s sandbox. She used conspiratorial language about corporations and oligarchs controlling governments and dictating global affairs to the detriment of the poor people around the world. It led her to sound more like a university faculty member than someone conducting foreign policy.”
Among other critiques, journalist Glenn Greenwald suggested either a failure on the part of her team or a rousing success if the goal was to ruin a potential presidential campaign before it even got off the ground.
“Whoever convinced AOC that she had successfully completed her tutoring and was now ready to give book reports about foreign policy in public really should look for another line of work,” wrote Greenwald in a caption over the lawmaker’s Venezuela commentary. “Unless the goal was to sabotage her. In which case: kudos for a job well done.”
Whoever convinced AOC that she had successfully completed her tutoring and was now ready to give book reports about foreign policy in public really should look for another line of work.
Unless the goal was to sabotage her. In which case: kudos for a job well done. https://t.co/1VC2CHmMSd
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) February 16, 2026
When your entire backstory is built on lies, misrepresentations, and omissions—as Ocasio-Cortez’s is—it must be exhausting to keep up the act.
— Ralph’s mom (@GalvestonTaxi) February 17, 2026
She didn’t “stumble.”
She nuked herself into the Stone Age.
— Mark (@Mark02081959) February 17, 2026
The New Republican Ad for 2028
— Bella (@Bella02112729) February 17, 2026
Native of Brooklyn, NY, Kevin Haggerty is a graduate of Hunter College where he studied Cultural Anthropology and Geography. An avid reader and truth seeker, he currently resides in Texas with his wife and their dog and, when he isn't researching current events and their impacts, you'll find him spending time with friends and family or working on his next novel.
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.