Debate rages over gender of ‘women’ suspects who allegedly sexually assaulted teen boy

The BBC is facing backlash for covering up that a 15-year-old British boy was allegedly sexually assaulted by two grown men.

The report emerged Wednesday, and in it the BBC claimed the boy was in fact assaulted by two grown women.

“The 15-year-old was walking along Cants Lane in Burgess Hill before heading through a wooded area towards World’s End at about 18:15 BST on 4 June. He was assaulted and woke up on the floor, police said,” the report reads.

“Both women were between 18 and 20 years old, one being 6ft 3in (1.9m) tall and with bright dyed red hair. She was wearing blue shorts and black crop top with pink Air Jordan trainers, and had glasses, a police spokesman said. The other was about 5ft 9in (1.75m) tall with long white blonde hair and spoke with a Merseyside accent.”

But because of the height of the two “women,” critics are 99.9 percent certain that the so-called “women” are really “transgender women,” meaning they’re biological men:

ADVERTISEMENT

But not everybody agrees. Many have asked for proof that the two “women” could actually be men.

“How do you know? I read six articles, and none of them made mention of this,” one critic noted.

See more responses below:

ADVERTISEMENT

In fairness to the BBC and its supporters, the Sussex Police reported the exact same thing as the British paper.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The 15-year-old reported walking along Cants Lane shortly before 6.15pm on Sunday, 4 June, then heading through a wooded area towards the World’s End area. He was assaulted by two women and suffered injuries to his head and body. The assault was reported to police and the boy was given support by specialist officers,” the police’s report reads.

The victim described the suspects as two women aged around 18 to 20 years old. One had bright red, believed to be coloured, hair, around 6’ 3” tall and wearing glasses. She was wearing blue shorts and a black crop top, with pink Air Jordan trainers. The second had very long white blonde hair and was around 5’ 9” tall, with a Merseyside accent.”

And so even the victim reportedly described the suspects as women.

But it’s not just the suspects’ height that drew scrutiny. So did their behavior:

ADVERTISEMENT

As noted above, “women very rarely commit sex crimes.”

This is true.

Dovetailing back to the height issue, not only is it “extremely rare for women to be that tall,” but it’s rarer still for two giant women to be seen together — and even rarer still for two tall women to commit a sexual assault.

The data reportedly proves it.

“A woman 5’9 is in the 90.8th percentile (i.e. taller than 90.8% of women) and a 6’4 is in the 99.999 percentile (taller than 99.999%),” according to The Heretical Liberal, an account on Twitter.

“In statistics, if we want to determine the probability of an event with multiple probabilities, we multiply them together. If we were to randomly select two women from a sample of the overall female population, the probability that one would be at least 5’9 is 9.2%, while the probability that the other is at least 6’4 is 0.001%,” the account’s mathematics continues.

If you multiply 9.2 percent by 0.001 percent, you get 0.000092 percent.

“So the probability of getting two randomly selected women with these heights is really, really f–king tiny,” The Heretical Liberal notes in his thread.

So were they really men or not? It’s really hard to tell without further information, but the evidence — including the Sussex Police’s “woke” history — suggests they were indeed men.

Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles