Dem attorney generals write Target CEO letter over pulling ‘Pride’ gear

Democrat state attorneys general keep harassing Target CEO Brian Cornell over the retailer’s decision to kowtow to the concerns of parents.

As previously reported, Target was caught last month peddling a wide array of LGBT-themed items for children. The discovery led to massive backlash, with parents across the country vowing to boycott the retailer until it removed the items.

In response, Target stores did indeed outright remove some of the LGBT-themed items. The rest of the items were relocated to the back of their stores.

Responding to this development, 15 Democrat attorneys general led by New York Attorney General Letitia James sent a letter to Cornell on June 7th demanding he “reverse your recent decision to remove products celebrating Pride Month from the shelves of certain Target stores.”

“While we respect your stated desire to protect staff members’ ‘sense of safety and well-being while at work,’ we encourage you to consider other measures, such as enhancing security, rather than capitulating to a small group of extreme individuals’ intimidation tactics,” the letter read.

“New York has a proud tradition of fighting for everyone’s right to express their gender identity and sexual orientation without fear of discrimination or harassment. For more than a decade, Target has been a vocal ally in that work. As we mark the beginning of Pride Month, we urge you to put Pride-related merchandise back on the shelves,” it continued.

ADVERTISEMENT

Notice how the Democrat AGs portrayed frustrated/outraged parents as “a small group of extreme individuals.”

Target responded to the letter by evidently doing nothing — there’s been no further change in policy since the “Pride” items were removed. This in turn apparently upset Democrats, who went ahead and sent yet another letter to Cornell on June 16th.

Led this time by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell, in this letter the AGs bemoaned “recent events in Target stores” and continued to lecture the retailer about the need to embrace “Pride.”

“We understand Target recently pulled some Pride merchandise from its shelves out of concern for worker and customer safety. While we understand the basis for this action, we are also concerned it sends a message that those who engage in hateful and disruptive conduct can cause even large corporations to succumb to their bullying, and that they have the power to determine when LGBTQIA+ consumers will feel comfortable in Target stores—or anywhere in society,” the letter read.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Though we do not doubt Target’s longstanding commitment to LGBTQIA+ equality, and though we laud your intention to keep your staff members and customers safe, we fear your choice to pull Pride merchandise demonstrates that intentional violence and intimidation can set back the march for social progress and LGBTQIA+ equality, which as we have noted is already under intense attack nationwide,” it added.

The AGs continued their letter by pointing Target to the states’ “many resources to support Target’s efforts to protect its staff and customers in the face of hate-based intimidation, harassment, threats, or attacks.”

In other words, they pointed Target to state laws that might be useful.

“Massachusetts, for instance, assigns liability under its public accommodations law not just to the owners or operators of those accommodations, but to any individual—including other customers or members of the public—who discriminates against others’ use and enjoyment of those accommodations on the basis of a protected characteristic like sexual orientation or gender identity,” the letter read.

“Similarly, the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act empowers the Commonwealth to seek injunctive relief against anyone who interferes with others’ constitutional and statutory rights by means of threats, intimidation, or coercion,” it continued.

ADVERTISEMENT

The letter concluded with an implicit threat:

“While these laws certainly do not create a legal obligation for retailers to offer any particular merchandise or create any particular displays, they do demand that customers be treated equally. In this context, we urge Target to be mindful of its obligations under these laws as it makes decisions as to how to respond to backlash against its Pride merchandise,” the letter read.

Some critics responded to the letters by wondering why these same Democrat AGs had failed to show the same interest in “helping” during the deadly Black Lives Matter riots of 2020.

Look:

ADVERTISEMENT

Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles