An X user who markets herself as a “strong voice against Trumpism” is taking heat after putting her vitriolic ignorance on display.
Andrea Junker responded to the SCOTUS case challenging President Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship and asked if Don Jr., Ivanka, and Eric Trump’s citizenship should be challenged because at the time of their births, their mother, Ivana, wasn’t yet a U.S. citizen.
There’s just one problem… their father was born in Queens, NY.
As someone who publicly dedicated part of their life to fighting “Trumpism,” one would assume that she knew that.
But here’s the post, in all its ill-fated glory:
Seems like a good day to remind everyone that Trump’s ex-wife Ivana wasn’t an American citizen until 1988. She gave birth to Don Junior in 1977, Ivanka in 1981, and Eric in 1984. — Let’s cancel their birthright citizenship first.
— Andrea Junker (@Strandjunker) April 1, 2026
While Junker (perfect name by the way), amassed over 20,000 ignorant likes for the illogical point, she also took a brutal beating in backlash:
‘Birthright Citizenship’ only comes into play when NEITHER parent is a US citizen.
Did you really not know that?
— melanie haber 🏴☠️ (@melsorbit) April 1, 2026
She didn’t think it through. That part we know for sure.
Hey dumbass, their father is an American citizen.
— Tomi Lahren (@TomiLahren) April 1, 2026
You kind of forget the part where Trump was a citizen and therefore they are citizens. Look it up dummy.
— DogFacePonia (@DogFacePonia) April 1, 2026
— Dinaculis (@dinaculis) April 2, 2026
Hey, this is stupid. Trump was an American citizen, therefore his children were automatic. Birthright refers to illegal immigrants, tourists and others. Diplomats children don’t become US citizens. So why should an illegal immigrants?
— Batman (@keithamccluske1) April 1, 2026
Their father is an American citizen so it shouldn’t matter if she was at the time. Also she was here legally.
— Charles (@CharlesHuntNews) April 1, 2026
How dumb are you? Why anyone would listen to you is beyond me. She came here LEGALLY and was married to a U.S. citizen who later became our great president!
— Lane B (@LaneB7777) April 1, 2026
Again, it’s amazing how much Democrats (and their ‘journalists’) rely on their audience not understanding how things work. https://t.co/83AFEU4QEx
— Super Journalist (Retired) – JOURN-EL of Skrypton (@Magnum_CK) April 1, 2026
It doesn’t appear that Junker has responded to the backlash or clarified her position. Probably because she doesn’t have to, her audience will absorb and run with it until the next false narrative drops.
- Arrested head of San Fran homeless initiative paid her son $10k to make 5 slides, prosecutors say - April 2, 2026
- ‘Dummy’ says Trump’s kids with Ivana are birthright babies. There’s one YUGE problem… - April 2, 2026
- Jim Acosta’s latest attention-seeking stunt supplies fresh mock-worthy material - April 2, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.