Gannett Co., America’s largest newspaper chain, demands USA Today and others roll back ‘biased’ articles

The country’s largest newspaper chain, Gannett Co., recently recommended that the papers it owns drastically dial back opinion pieces and political endorsements and dedicate more time to churning out real news instead of agitprop.

“Its recommendations include cutting back on ‘unsigned’ editorials that don’t state who wrote them, limiting political endorsements to local races and eliminating syndicated national columns. Gannett has also urged its newspapers to stop publishing letters to the editor online, restricting them to print editions except in rare cases,” The Washington Post reported Thursday.

As a result, some of the papers owned by Gannett “have begun to radically shrink and reimagine their editorial sections” and are now “publishing them on fewer days each week and dropping traditional features such as syndicated columns and editorial cartoons.”

“Even political endorsements and letters to the editor are being scaled back,” according to the Post.

Why this request? Some wonder whether it has anything to do with the company’s stock trading at a record low:

The Post for its part notes that during a Gannett meeting in April of a “committee of editors” from across the country claimed editors said point-blank that the American people don’t want to be lectured to by journalists.

“Readers don’t want us to tell them what to think. They don’t believe we have the expertise to tell anyone what to think on most issues. They perceive us as having a biased agenda,” they said.

This is true, for the most part. Data from Gallup shows that of all Americans, only a majority of Democrats place their “trust in mass media.”

The editors reportedly added that editorials and opinion columns are “among our least read content.” Worse, they’re “frequently cited” by readers as a reason for them cancelling their subscriptions to said paper.

There’s only one catch. The recommendations by Gannett are voluntary, and only a handful of papers have thus far chosen to apply them.

“While Gannett says the recommendations are not mandatory and most of its papers still have editorial and commentary pages, at least four of its newspapers have slashed their daily opinion offerings in recent days. More are expected to follow suit,” according to the Post.

Not included among them, it seems, is USA Today, which is notorious for its unappealingly “woke” perspective on matters:

“While USA TODAY and the USA TODAY Network’s editorial approach to opinion pages has evolved throughout the course of many years, our commitment to challenging convention and sharing diverse opinions has not changed. We continue to ensure we balance the need for locally focused topics with national themes of relevance that resonate with our readers and the communities we serve,” a spokesperson told Fox News.

The four slated to apply the recommendations include The Arizona Republic, the Cape Cod Times, the Treasure Coast Palm, and The New Bern Sun Journal.

“The Arizona Republic announced last week that it would publish an opinion section in its print edition only three days per week so it could ‘refocus our time and efforts on facilitating a deeper dialogue on key issues affecting Arizonans,'” the Post notes.

“Similarly, Gannett’s Cape Cod Times in Massachusetts and Treasure Coast Palm in Florida said last week they will publish editorial pages only two days a week. The New Bern Sun Journal in North Carolina will go to one day a week.”

Gannett owns hundreds of papers, including plenty of big-name ones like USA Today, the Detroit Free Press, The Indianapolis Star, The Cincinnati Enquirer, and The Tennessean.

At the moment, The Arizona Republic appears to be the only big-name paper applying the recommendations.

The response to the big news about Gannett has provoked a divided response, with some lamenting the downsizing of opinion pieces, but the majority expressing support — and wishing TV outlets like CNN and MSNBC would follow suit:

The only problem, of course, is that the establishment press routinely hides opinions behind a facade of objective, oftentimes so-called “expert”-based “journalisming,” as conservative commentator Ben Shapiro calls it.

It’s unclear whether Gannett’s recommendations apply to “journalisming” as well …

DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE

If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.

Thank you for your donation!
Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

PLEASE JOIN OUR NEW COMMENT SYSTEM! We love hearing from our readers and invite you to join us for feedback and great conversation. If you've commented with us before, we'll need you to re-input your email address for this. The public will not see it and we do not share it.

Latest Articles