News/Commentary

New Yorker writer who attacked Sydney Sweeney slithers away after hate-filled anti-white posts surface

August 19, 2025 | | Print Article

The Sydney Sweeney slamming, anti-white New Yorker writer made moves as conservative Christopher Rufo posed a lucrative offer to her peers.

Late last week, Doreen St. Félix’s piece dubbing Sydney Sweeney as an “Aryan princess” following her role in an American Eagle ad campaign — and the subsequent leftist meltdown — was met with highlights of the writer’s record of anti-white sentiment.

Amid the exposure of hatred, St. Félix had reportedly deleted her account and, as of Monday, Rufo was offering up to $125,000 to the first full-time staff writer at her outlet to come forward with a public resignation denouncing the New Yorker’s alleged “culture of anti-white and antisemitic racism.”

Posted to X with the caption, “It’s time to stop the hate,” Rufo set a 48-hour deadline for his deal as he explained, “We understand that many New Yorker writers want to resign over the fact that a virulent anti-white racist and Holocaust revisionist is on their payroll, but David Remnick and the Newhouse family pay them so poorly that they cannot afford to do so.”

“So we’re offering one year’s salary in Bitcoin to any New Yorker staff writer who pens a public letter of resignation over the magazine’s culture of anti-white and antisemitic racism. This offer is good for the next 48 hours, for one full-time staff writer, up to $125,000,” he went on. “Interested parties must reach out to my team in advance and negotiate final terms, escrow, and transaction, per our approval. It’s time to stop the hate.”

As had been reported, Rufo curated screenshots of St. Félix going as far back as 2014, three years prior to her being hired by the magazine, with statements like, “You all are the worst. Go nurse your f*cking Oedipal complexes and leave the earth to the browns and the women,” “we lived in perfect harmony [with] the earth pre whiteness,” “WRITE LIKE NO WHITE IS WATCHING,” “would be heartbroken if I had kids with a white guy,” and simply, “I hate white men.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The exposure for her past comments followed the piece about Sweeney and the “great jeans” campaign that found the writer arguing, “The allusion is incoherent, unless, of course, we root around for other meanings, and we don’t have to search for ling: genes, referring to Sweeney’s famously large breasts; genes, referring to her whiteness.”

“The American Eagle campaign, its presentation of Americana as a zombie slop of mustangs, denim, and good genes, is lowest-common-denominator stuff … Interestingly, breasts, and the desire for them, are stereotyped as objects of white desire, as opposed to say, the Black man’s hunger for a**,” added St. Félix. “Sweeney, on the precipice of totalizing fame, has an adoring legion, the most extreme of whom want to recruit her as a kind of Aryan princess.”

Among those reacting to Rufo’s proposal, Ilya Shapiro, the Manhattan Institute’s director of constitutional studies, lauded the move for further exposing the “literati” who’d taken lengths to support St. Félix, “Rufo vs the New Yorker is a litmus test for whether you want American ascent or decline. My [Manhattan Institute] colleague has made all the literati twist themselves into knots defending not only an obnoxious bigot but a terrible writer. Bravo!”

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT
Kevin Haggerty
Latest posts by Kevin Haggerty (see all)

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles