Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki came up short when she tried to implicate President Donald Trump in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal.
Psaki elicited a painfully awkward exchange while interviewing Epstein victim Sharlene Rochard on Tuesday.
Psaki was questioning Rochard about parties she attended at Trump’s Florida Mar-a-Lago estate when she was a teenager.
“Did [Epstein] send you there? Were you told to go there?” Psaki asked.
Rochard explained that there were “a lot of model parties” at the estate that were set up by various people and magazines.
She denied that she was ever “sent” to Mar-a-Lago by Epstein.
So, Psaki pressed further.
“I just have to ask if you think [Trump] was aware of that arrangement,” Psaki finally blurted out.
Her question prompted a long pause from Rochard before answering.
“Um… I, I don’t know if he was aware,” she said. “Actually, I can’t answer that. I’m sorry.”
Psaki continued on as she appeared to be more concerned about disparaging Trump than the Epstein victim sitting right in front of her.
“And I think this is important for people to understand that people were in their teens and were young, and you were a, you were a young model and you were, you were handled by a predator.”
“Epstein Survivor Falls Silent for 5 Full Seconds When Jen Psaki Asks Her About Trump”
The headline on this MSN clip is so deliberately misleading it’s shocking anyone falls for it without watching the actual video. Let me clear it up for you, since “Circle-Back” Psaki never… pic.twitter.com/kTYshs1fis
— ♡Land Of ILLUSION♡ (@Landofillusion1) November 19, 2025
Psaki, like her Dem co-horts, are chomping at the bit to nail Trump in connection to Jeffrey Epstein. Lest we forget Psaki’s recent slip of the tongue that went viral:
Jen Psaki gets too excited about the Epstein email hoax, says “other predators out there in addition to Trump” then hurriedly walks it back.
Visions of a lawsuit immediately danced in her head. pic.twitter.com/M7b0cmJDzk
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 13, 2025
Plenty of X users see through Psaki’s game:
They only seem interested in one person for some reason.
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) November 13, 2025
Too legally cagey. Either name names or go away. It reeks of a $ grab
— John Bolger (@Bolgernow) November 19, 2025
Her excitement tells us all we need to know about the hoax.
— JKash MAGA Queen (@JKash000) November 13, 2025
- Harvard law prof agrees to self-deport after claiming he was ‘hunting rats’ outside synagogue - December 5, 2025
- ‘This a joke?’ CNBC conjures up Cracker Barrel vibes with announcement of new logo - December 5, 2025
- Eric Adams launches preemptive strike against Mamdani with two pro-Israel executive orders - December 4, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
