News/Commentary

Sec Hegseth ‘is standing between President Trump and a coup,’ scholars say

April 21, 2026 | | Print Article

There seems to be a concerted effort to attack Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and one X user thinks it goes beyond anti-Trump sentiment.

While most of President Donald Trump’s cabinet members have come under fire from the left for simply being associated with his administration, it appears that the campaign against Hegseth is more targeted than others. DataRepublican shares why he thinks this is, and the role that the secretary plays in keeping things together.

Watch:

“The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he’s standing between President Trump and a coup. [Hegseth] named the institutions… CFR, Brookings, the general class… in 37 seconds in a video by [Liz Wheeler]. Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat,”the user wrote. “They didn’t go after him because of drinking. They didn’t go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don’t.”

“I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is not my theory. This is theirs. Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan — the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field — studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding: Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed,” the thread continued. “So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next? She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video. ‘Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters.'”

“130,000 people are told: ‘When they crack and power within them shifts, the entire edifice can crumble.’ ‘They’ = security forces… our military. Yes, Stefan’s teachings are now informing a mass American audience that it’s how you bring down a government,” he explained. “It gets worse. Hardy Merriman — Gene Sharp’s personal assistant, co-author of the CANVAS regime change field manual used in 50+ countries — wrote a domestic version. It says: ‘Those who serve in government institutions swear an oath to uphold the Constitution. They don’t swear allegiance to the president himself.’ Then it teaches them how to defect: call in sick, work slowly, ignore orders, leak to media, publicly defy.”

“Now look at what their own planning document says about Hegseth. The ‘Democracy Playbook 2025’ — the same document that teaches ‘dealing with security forces’ and color revolution case studies — cites this in footnote 49: ‘Pete Hegseth had been flagged by fellow service member as possible ‘Insider Threat” — AP, November 15, 2024. 72 hours after his nomination. In a regime change manual,” the thread reads.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Then the operation went live. November 11, 2025: The National Lawyers Guild Military Law Task Force publishes ‘FAQ on Refusing Illegal Orders.’ November 12: Same group publishes a statement calling U.S. Venezuela operations ‘war crimes’ and declaring officers ‘should refuse superior orders.’ Remember these dates,” he advised. “Six days later. November 18. Six Democratic members of Congress — all military veterans — release a video telling active-duty troops: ‘You MUST refuse illegal orders.'”

The thread continues, but the conclusion is this:

The post reads:

ADVERTISEMENT

Pete Hegseth named the institutions in 37 seconds. The institutions responded with:

– Pre-positioned oppo research activated in 72 hours
– A regime change planning document citing him by name
– A legal predicate for military disobedience published the same week as the Seditious Six video
– A pipeline that produced the cohort
– A grand jury they couldn’t win
– A replacement they CAN co-opt
– Braver Angels and MWEG sitting at the same table as the color revolution coordinators
– A physical barricade at the building where the playbook was written

They’re not trying to get rid of a bad SecDef. They’re trying to remove the one obstacle that makes their entire methodology fail.

X users reacted:

ADVERTISEMENT

Sierra Marlee
Latest posts by Sierra Marlee (see all)

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles