Not that any more proof was needed that the transgender movement is a haven for sick perverts and child predators, but one cross-dressing lawmaker from Minnesota served it up anyway.
During a Thursday state House committee hearing on the topic of age limits for adult sex websites, Rep. Leigh Finke who is a member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, tried to make a case for why “queer” children need access to X-rated pornographic content, insisting that it is for “educational” reasons.
The two-term leftist suggested that the attorney generals in states that require age-verification to access the adult content are “almost jubilant” over the opportunity to prevent the “queer” youngsters from being exposed to the raunchy material that can be used for educational purposes about their homosexuality.
Transgender Minnesota State Rep Leigh Finke opposes age verification laws for adult sites because he thinks it can be “educational” for kids to access it
This dude is a disgusting creep pic.twitter.com/WWqjzMILW0
— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) February 20, 2026
“They’re almost jubilant about being able to use these laws to ban young people from accessing content that could be educational if they are queer,” claimed Finke, a biological man who transitioned in 2017.
“You’re a principal, you have LGBT students in your school, and we also know that they’re not receiving sex education for queer kids, we know that prurient interest could be for many people the very existence of transgender kids. More and more people are saying, there are simply no transgender kids,” the Democrat added.
Finke’s reasoning for exposing children to graphic homosexual porn was greeted with disgust from X users.
It is concerning @LeighFinke prefers minors have access to adult content.
— HI808 (@hi808sun) February 20, 2026
Believe them when they speak. They want to groom your kids.
— Dustin Grage (@GrageDustin) February 20, 2026
I don’t like to be one of those, “check his hard drive people,” but any time I hear someone pushing wildly inappropriate sexual stuff for kids, I always suspect there’s a reason for that.
— John Hawkins (@johnhawkinsrwn) February 20, 2026
Tell us you’re a child groomer without actually saying it.
I’m sure every child groomer tells law enforcement while their pants are at their ankles, “Honest, officer, I was just doing this for educational purposes for these children. “Right, this is why you have noticeable…
— Cam Evenson (@OngGiaFiinSu) February 20, 2026
Absolutely, nothing that they’re asking for makes any sense to https://t.co/krXITf8I4U‘s like there working for pedophiles
— C.Cunning1 (@ChrisCu43126453) February 20, 2026
What else do you need to hear!??
GROOMERS.— Tea Party Barbie (@laurahollis61) February 21, 2026
Is it really that bizarre considering the “identity” of the man in question revolves around acting out his deviant sexual impulses in front of a non-consenting audience?
Seems pretty on the nose to me.
— AJ Kay (@AJKayWriter) February 21, 2026
In a healthy society, this person would be removed from office and put under observation.
— Andrea (@Anvesaka88) February 20, 2026
Can’t the queer kids just watch anything Disney has pumped out in the last decade or so? Problem solved.
— Paul Klein 🏎️🇺🇸🇳🇴🏎️ (@SgtWRC) February 20, 2026
There are many legitimate arguments about the push for online age verification, including that it opens the door to eliminate anonymity for political speech, but Finke’s reason is a real doozy that only reinforces the suspicion of many that the Democratic Party is the party of pedophiles.
- ‘Bad mojo’ – Former NY Rangers star and team network analyst blames ugly loss on ‘Pride Night’ - March 18, 2026
- Top TSA official warns airports could ‘quite literally shut down’ as Dems stubbornly refuse to fund DHS - March 18, 2026
- Trump said he talked to former president who praised him over taking action on Iran but none will admit it - March 17, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.