Billionaire investor and hedge fund manager Bill Ackman has warned of impending economic collapse by Monday unless the government bails out Silicon Valley Bank, a behemoth that collapsed last week.
“The gov’t has about 48 hours to fix a-soon-to-be-irreversible mistake,” he tweeted early Saturday morning.
Why? It starts with the fact that, like other banks, Silicon Valley Bank has clients, and these clients have their money stored in the bank. The problem is their deposits are mostly uninsured, and so their clients are at the risk of losing all their money.
Why were SVB’s clients’ deposits uninsured? Because the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation only insures deposits up to $250,000, but most of SVB’s client were Silicon Valley startups with millions of dollars in their accounts.
Regardless, Ackman wrote on that Twitter that unless someone, anyone, bails out the bank, other people will start withdrawing their own money from smaller, less secure banks too, lest they lose theirs as well:
The gov’t has about 48 hours to fix a-soon-to-be-irreversible mistake. By allowing @SVB_Financial to fail without protecting all depositors, the world has woken up to what an uninsured deposit is — an unsecured illiquid claim on a failed bank. Absent @jpmorgan @citi or… https://t.co/SqdkFK7Fld
— Bill Ackman (@BillAckman) March 11, 2023
“By allowing @SVB_Financial to fail without protecting all depositors, the world has woken up to what an uninsured deposit is — an unsecured illiquid claim on a failed bank,” he wrote.
“Absent @jpmorgan @citi or @BankofAmerica acquiring SVB before the open on Monday, a prospect I believe to be unlikely, or the gov’t guaranteeing all of SVB’s deposits, the giant sucking sound you will hear will be the withdrawal of substantially all uninsured deposits from all but the ‘systemically important banks’ (SIBs),” he added.
The assumption is that their money would be much safer in SIBs.
According to Investopedia, an SIB is a bank “that U.S. federal regulators determine would pose a serious risk to the economy if it were to collapse. A [SIB] is viewed as ‘too big to fail’ and imposed with extra regulatory burdens to prevent it from going under.”
It’s basically a better protected bank.
Continuing his tweet, Ackman warned that the transfer of all this money from smaller banks to SIBs “will drain liquidity from community, regional and other banks and begin the destruction of these important institutions.”
“These funds will be transferred to the SIBs, US Treasury (UST) money market funds and short-term UST. There is already pressure to transfer cash to short-term UST and UST money market accounts due to the substantially higher yields available on risk-free UST vs. bank deposits,” he wrote.
“These withdrawals will drain liquidity from community, regional and other banks and begin the destruction of these important institutions. The increased demand for short-term UST will drive short rates lower complicating the @federalreserve’s efforts to raise rates to slow the economy,” he added.
Despite this warning, many people still oppose a bailout on the basis that it’s unfair to everyday Americans who don’t get a bailout when they screw up.
Look:
SVB investors were ok with the big risks until failed. They gambled and lost. No bailout.
— UR Mom (@e_dirienzo) March 12, 2023
Interesting for a man involved in “risk” capitalism all his life… Now wants the rules thrown out the window and for a taxpayer bailout of a completely incompetent bank management failure. Humm… But he has no skin in the game. Un huh.
— RLK (@All_Gravy_Baby) March 12, 2023
Lastly, whatever happened to thrift & personal responsibility? If you decide to work at a start-up, maybe (just maybe) you should have set aside some $ to get you thru dry periods. I have no sympathy for all these folks expecting a govt bailout.
— SevenCornersCapital (@sevencornerscap) March 12, 2023
All deposits for all Americans are insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC. Let’s call this SVB collapse what it was – a pyramid scheme built on a continuous increase in VC money. You put your money in a risky institution for the high payoff. It didn’t work out. No bailout
— UR Mom (@e_dirienzo) March 12, 2023
No. There should not be a free ride above the $250k per person. That is why we have a legal process for Bankruptcy, Reorganization / Liquidation. SVB screwed up + its stockholders and depositors failed to perform their due diligence. MGT must be held to account. No Bailout.
— cinderella boudreaux (@cinderellaboud1) March 12, 2023
But others say it’s equally unfair to screw over all the Silicon Valley startups who’d entrusted their money with SVB.
“Already thousands of the fastest growing, most innovative venture-backed companies in the U.S. will begin to fail to make payroll next week,” Ackman noted in his tweet.
He further argued that this could have been avoided had the federal government simply guaranteed SVB’s deposits.
“Had the gov’t stepped in on Friday to guarantee SVB’s deposits (in exchange for penny warrants which would have wiped out the substantial majority of its equity value) this could have been avoided and SVB’s 40-year franchise value could have been preserved and transferred to a new owner in exchange for an equity injection,” he wrote.
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- ‘Woke’ Disney to lay off thousands, orders managers to compile list of employees to cut - March 19, 2023
- Dramatic upswing of FBI terror watchlist suspects being arrested at southern border - March 19, 2023
- NHL player cites Bible, faith in Jesus Crist to explain refusal to wear LGBTQ-themed jersey - March 19, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.