DeSantis scores another courtroom victory over children’s drag show law

A federal appeals court has upheld a Florida law that bans children from attending drag shows and other “adult live performances.”

Signed into law in 2023 by Gov. Ron DeSantis, the Protection of Children Act specifically bars adults from knowingly admitting children to “adult live performances” that are clearly harmful to kids.

Shortly after the law took effect in May of 2023, the drag-themed casual dining restaurant chain Hamburger Mary’s sued.

Hamburger Mary’s, which had a history of hosting supposedly family-friendly drag shows, argued “that the measure was too broad and unconstitutionally vague, and infringed on First Amendment rights,” according to The Advocate.

A month later, U.S. District Judge Gregory Presnell issued a 24-page injunction blocking Florida from enforcing the law on the grounds that the law was “specifically designed to suppress the speech of drag queen performers.”

Presnell is a Clinton appointee.

ADVERTISEMENT

Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation Secretary Melanie Griffin filed an appeal later that same month. Two years later in May of 2025, an Eleventh Circuit panel affirmed the injunction.

However, Florida then asked the full court to review the decision. They, in turn, decided on Tuesday to drop the injunction and uphold the law.

The bad news is the case isn’t over yet — it “now heads back to a trial court in Orlando,” according to the Tallahassee Democrat.

The good news is the court ruled that Hamburger Mary’s “failed to establish a substantial likelihood” that it’ll ultimately win its case in the long-term.

“In any event, the Act is consistent with a legislative intent to target drag shows that are obscene for children, not drag shows writ large,” Circuit Judge Andrew Brasher wrote, debunking the claim that the law unfairly targets all drag shows.

ADVERTISEMENT

Florida celebrated the ruling:

“We appreciate today’s decision from the 11th Circuit affirming Florida’s Protection of Children Act,” Griffin tweeted. “Thanks to @GovRonDeSantis ’ leadership, #DBPR remains committed to protecting children from inappropriate and sexually charged performances and helping our licensees understand their responsibilities under Florida’s law.”

DBPR is short for the Department of Business and Professional Regulation.

Some judges dissented. Circuit Judge Robin Rosenbaum, an Obama appointee, said that “the state intentionally created this statute to ‘chill drag’ and that the vague language ‘serves as an especially pernicious club to silence political speech,'” according to the Tallahassee Democrat.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Under this form of jurisprudence, a citizen can learn whether a law prohibits their speech only by taking a wild guess, presenting their speech, and then seeing if they get arrested and face imprisonment, thousands of dollars in fines, and loss of their business license,” she added.

Melissa Stewart, a representative for Hamburger Mary’s of Orlando, issued a post-ruling statement echoing the rogue judge’s arguments.

She accused the court of having “held that the State may target speech it dislikes and strip parents of their right to determine what is appropriate for their own children.”

“We believe that the First Amendment’s protections are more robust than that,” she continued. “This litigation is not over, and we will continue fighting to protect free speech in the state of Florida.”

Critics argue that THIS is not free speech (*graphic content warning):

ADVERTISEMENT

Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles