The problem with sanctimonious liberals, as U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., has already proven after getting busted for sleeping with a Chinese spy, is that there is no level of depravity that will prompt them to go away.
And this is where disgraced former FBI agent Peter Strzok comes into play. Of all things, the fired bureau agent reacted online to a comment from former Attorney General Bill Barr about Special Counsel John Durham, seemingly defending the Russian collusion hoax.
“Bill Barr brazenly saying the quiet part out loud: Durham using criminal prosecutions to get out a false Russia narrative is ‘far more important’ than actually achieving convictions,” Strzok tweeted.
https://twitter.com/petestrzok/status/1532161686790094849?s=20&t=Zz7DrXLXlwgRYpnJx9LNcw
The “false Russia narrative” being the plot hatched by Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party, but that little detail appears to have slipped past Strzok, who has shown a propensity to get distracted from the task at hand — by engaging in extramarital affairs with coworkers, for instance.
Barr appeared this week on Fox News’ “Jesse Watters Primetime,” and was asked by the show’s namesake if he was disappointed in Durham after a dubious DC jury acquitted former Clinton attorney Michael Sussmann of lying to the FBI.
“No, I’m very proud of John Durham,” Barr told Watters. “And I do take responsibility for his appointment. And I think he and his team did an exceptionally able job, both seeking out very important facts and presenting a compelling case to the jury. And the fact that while he did not succeed in getting a conviction from the D.C. jury, I think he accomplished something far more important, which is he brought out the truth in two important areas.
“First I think he crystallized the central role played by the Hillary campaign and launching as a dirty trick the whole Russia-gate collusion narrative and fanning the flames of it,” he continued. “And, second, I think he exposed really dreadful behavior by the supervisors in the FBI, the senior ranks of the FBI, who knowingly used this information to start an investigation of Trump and then dupe their own agents by lying to them and refusing to tell them what the real source of that information was. And that was appalling.”
As for Strzok, social media seems to believe he has his panties in a bunch over the FBI being exposed as little more than an extension of the Democratic Party.
Here’s a quick sampling of responses to the story from Twitter:
Don’t you have a coworker to bang?
— Real Man of Genius (@realmanofgenius) June 2, 2022
Durham getting the truth out that you’re a liar and that the Russia collusion narrative was a concoction of the DNC is “far more important” than actually achieving convictions. Fixed it for ya. You’re welcome. @PolitiBunny @ScotsFyre @brithume
— Douglas Dunklin (@DougDunklin) June 2, 2022
Oh honey. Mook showed his arse. We all know you, your boss & your girlfriend got taken for a ride by the Empress of Chappaqua. Of course you were all willing passengers.
— Stacey – Gen X the Let’s Find Out Generation (@ScotsFyre) June 2, 2022
Everyone knows what was done. Everyone also knows we have a two tiered justice system. There was no chance a DC jury was going to convict a Clinton crony. No one wants to face Arkancide.
— Rick Robinson 🇺🇸 Biden is a House Plant (@RowdyRick73) June 2, 2022
Someone’s upset that the FBI’s deception, malfeasance and incompetence has been exposed. https://t.co/RhPVAfqIIS
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) June 2, 2022
Says the guy who was using false opposition dirt to investigate an opposition political campaign.
Yeah, take it from a Top IC Agent who couldn’t keep his affair & political bias texts secret from all America.
You’re a sharp one @petestrzok 🤡#Durham pic.twitter.com/qiSGijDshs— Joe “I’ll take Ultra MAGA over Mega Moron” Friday (@InsurancePlanX) June 2, 2022
- Trump: Maduro will take back Tren de Aragua gang members AND even supply transportation - February 1, 2025
- FBI Academy photo perfectly captures Trump’s war on DEI - February 1, 2025
- Mel Gibson speculates on whether there’s a ‘purpose’ behind devastating LA fires - January 11, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.