Elon Musk brilliantly SLAYS Economist editor’s every false allegation

Elon Musk served up what has been characterized as a masterclass in handling the hopelessly biased media during an interview with The Economist’s editor-in-chief, Zanny Minton Beddoes.

At one point in the exchange, Beddoes alleged that people “loathe” Musk because he “influences” politics, and the world’s richest man flipped the script on her entirely when he replied, “I don’t care. The fact that a quarter billion people follow me means a lot more people like me than don’t. And I think a lot more people hate you and the media than you realize!”

The media cabal would never inform billionaire George Soros that he is loathed because of his radical left influence on politics.

In another exchange, Beddoes tried to claim that Musk supports not just the “far right,” but the very “fringe” elements, and again he brilliantly put the allegation right back in her lap for dishonestly framing the right.

“No, I support the normal people — what you call the far right, falsely,” replied the Tesla CEO who also founded SpaceX. “Literally, you could go back 10-15 years, and these policies were completely normal.”

Musk suggested that the “lunatic left” would denounce a speech given 10 years ago by Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton, if told that President Donald Trump gave that speech. He added that the principles being described as “fringe” are basic things like secure borders, safe cities, and sensible spending.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I would like to just admonish you and the media for the absurd characterization of the far right. It is false and misleading, and nonsense,” Musk said, turning to the camera to tell those editing the interview, “Please keep this part in.”

Beddoes also tried to push the fabricated talking point that cuts motivated by DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) have resulted in the deaths of African children. But Musk countered to insist that “ZERO” deaths have occurred.

“When funding is stopped for a fraudulent organization, do you think they’re going to say: ‘Please keep funding the fraud!’ Or do you think they’re going to come up with a sad story that sounds sympathetic in order to get the funding restored? Obviously it will be the latter. And that’s exactly what they did,” he said.

Here’s a quick sampling of responses to the story, as seen on X:

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Tom Tillison

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles