New Twitter Files show breadth of ‘civil society’ orgs and government colluding to silence dissent, ‘cartel-style’

The latest edition of the “Twitter Files” shows how an “alliance of academics, journalists, intelligence operatives, military personnel, government bureaucrats, NGO workers and more” are working together to silence dissent.

The latest edition was released Tuesday by Andrew Lowenthal, who reportedly spent 18 years as the executive director of Engage Media, a non-governmental organization “devoted to protecting digital rights and freedoms.”

“In recent years, I watched with concern and then despair as a dramatic change swept through my field. Organizations & peers began de-emphasizing freedom of expression, instead promoting surveillance & censorship to combat ‘disinformation.’ … I knew things were bad. When I started work on the #TwitterFiles, I learned: they’re far worse,” Lowenthal writes.

“The Files show an uncanny alliance of academics, journalists, intelligence operatives, military personnel, government bureaucrats, NGO workers and more. … I had always understood ‘civil society’ to mean ‘not the military.’ The former exists to check the latter. So I was shocked to see the depth of collaboration. For instance, ‘civil society’ groups coordinating with Pentagon officials in an ‘election tabletop’ exercise. Why?” he continues.

“In a functioning democracy there’s dynamic tension between government, civil society organizations, news media, and industry, all advancing their own interests, in theory keeping one another honest. In the #TwitterFiles we find them all working together, cartel-style,” he adds, concluding his opener.

View the beginning of the “Files” below:

ADVERTISEMENT

As an example of them all working together, Lowenthal includes proof of Twitter’s pre-Elon Musk staff asking for then-Twitter general counsel Jim Baker, a former FBI guy, to give his blessing for EIP and Virality Project partner Graphika to “inform their partners in USG 3-5 days before publication” about a report reportedly detailing Pentagon disinformation operations.

“Graphika receives money from the Pentagon, Navy, and Air Force, while simultaneously supporting human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Working with both the perpetrators & those representing the victims is very 2023,” he writes.

View the proof below:

“During the War on Terror the DHS was harshly criticized by progressives for civil rights violations and targeting of Muslims,” Lowenthal continues.

ADVERTISEMENT

In fact, the Department of Homeland Security still faces massive criticism from the left for daring to arrest and deport illegal aliens — some of them, at least.

Yet ironically enough, DHS is now working “closely with progressive tech.”

Here’s an example of pre-Elon Twitter staff welcoming a DHS staffer’s job application:

“Other DHS staff such as Matt Masterson become fellows at the Stanford Internet Observatory and work on the Virality Project’s censorship of ‘true stories of vaccine side effects.’ The revolving door between academia, government, NGO’s and BigTech is endless,” Lowenthal writes.

ADVERTISEMENT

As another example, he points to the Hunter Biden exercise completed by the Aspen Institute weeks before the laptop story broke in late 2020 (and was subsequently censored).

Attended by top Twitter staff, the exercise “involved an 11-day scenario in October 2020 that began with the imaginary release of falsified records related to Hunter Biden’s controversial employment by the Ukrainian energy company Burisma, which paid him as much as $1 million a year to serve on its board when his father was vice president,” according to the New York Post.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dovetailing back to the present, Lowenthal then draws attention to the recent bombshell that Secretary of State Antony Blinken was behind the phony “Russian disinformation” intelligence letter that was used to censor the Hunter Biden story.

The irony is a little too much for him.

“At RightsCon, civil society’s biggest digital rights event, Blinken spoke [last year] on ‘disinformation’ with Nobel Prize winner Maria Ressa,” he writes.

“See how it works? The people accusing others of ‘disinformation’ RUN the biggest disinformation campaigns themselves. Anti-disinformation conferences teem with Beltway journalists – the same names from the Post, Times, Atlantic, and NBC, over and over – but these proto-censorship workshops are often off the record, like defense or intel confabs. Reporters are participants, not adversaries,” he continues.

Bingo!

Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles