Trump just dramatically escalated his battle with the Smithsonian

Amid peddling her book on the “Imperial Presidency,” Maggie Haberman’s slant skewed steeper in framing a “massive” escalation that the public viewed as mere accountability.

Tuesday, along with her The New York Times peer Jonathan Swan, Haberman is set to release the new book, “Regime Change: Inside the Imperial Presidency of Donald Trump.” Just days earlier, she took umbrage with orders toward addressing inaccuracy at the Smithsonian Institution, sharing an article from her peers on a signage executive order deemed an “unusual directive” by the Gray Lady’s muckrakers.

“Trump massively escalates against the Smithsonian,” wrote Haberman, captioning the article, “Trump Orders Warnings Placed at ‘Inaccurate’ Smithsonian History Museum.”

Within the piece, Robin Pogrebin and Zachary Small deemed Trump’s order to have warning signs placed outside exhibits of the Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History (NAMH) regarding the “social justice lens” skewing the information as a “considerable escalation.”

“The unusual directive, made through an executive order, was a considerable escalation of the president’s dispute with the Smithsonian and its history museum, which was the subject of a recent 162-page report,” they wrote. “The report accused the museum’s director Anthea M. Hartig, of ‘radical activist ideology’ and the museum of undermining ‘faith in American institutions.'”

The Times’ article further stated, “The order went so far as to suggest that the signage inform potential museum visitors of locations where American history is better presented. The administration did not explain where the public would be redirected.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Among those criticizing Haberman and corporate media for their perspective, some pointed to last week’s congressional hearing where NMAH Director Anthea Hartig was questioned on, among other things, why the museum promoted a toolkit that considered politeness white supremacy while an exhibit appeared to peg Mickey Mouse as racist.

At the same hearing where Texas Rep. Brandon Gill (R) confronted Hartig with those points, The Heritage Foundation senior fellow Mike Gonzalez had testified that a special exhibit of the Smithsonian titled, “The Electric Dr. Franklin” featured a display that wondered if the Founding Father “had ever done experiments, electrical electroshock on indentured servants or slaves.”

According to Gonzalez, the notion was presented “without producing any evidence whatsoever.”

“Why smear a Founding Father such as Ben Franklin by pondering such a really bizarre thing?” the witness posited.

When asked about “concerning examples” presented during the hearing and whether she had any regrets, Hartig told Georgia Rep. Brian Jack (R), “I am incredibly proud of the work we’ve done, but we are imperfect, and we surely have made mistakes. But I don’t have any regrets.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Reactions to Haberman’s post were none too keen on the framing, calling out the Franklin example while decrying the museum for having “abandoned its mission to teach and preserve history” while adopting and advancing Marxist ideology.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kevin Haggerty

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles