Contempt proceedings are set to begin for the Clintons after the House Oversight Committee’s chair slammed their “indefensible demand” in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation.
“I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.”
Last year, in seeking testimony from former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, subpoenas were issued for them and others to testify about the late convicted sex offender. Now, after both had failed to present themselves, an alleged alternative to meet without a recorded transcript had Oversight Committee chair Kentucky Rep. James Comer (R) ripping the Clintons for “insulting” the American people, with alleged demands for “special treatment.”
“Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only,” began a statement from Comer on X. “No official transcript would be recorded and other Members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected the Clintons’ ridiculous offer.”
🚨🚨🚨
Facing contempt of Congress, the Clintons’ lawyers made an untenable offer: that I travel to New York for a conversation with President Clinton only. No official transcript would be recorded and other Members of Congress would be barred from participating. I have rejected…
— Rep. James Comer (@RepJamesComer) January 20, 2026
“The Clintons’ latest demands make clear they believe their name entitles them to special treatment,” he went on.
Referencing Clinton’s 1998 impeachment, Comer spoke to the import of transcribed depositions, under oath, especially given that the president “has a documented history of parsing language to evade questions, responded falsely under oath, and was impeached and suspended from the practice of law as a result.”
“The absence of an official transcript is an indefensible demand that is insulting to the American people who demand answers about Epstein’s crimes,” wrote the lawmaker who made note of transcripts released after interviews with former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr and former U.S. Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta for the sake of transparency. “Without a formal record, Americans would be left to rely on competing accounts of what was said.”
Where it concerns the former first lady and senator, Comer noted, “Former Secretary Clinton’s on-the-record testimony is necessary for the Committee’s investigation given her knowledge from her time as Secretary of State of the federal government’s work to counter international sex-tracking rings, her personal knowledge of Ms. Maxwell, and her family’s relationship with Mr. Epstein.”
“Contempt proceedings begin tomorrow,” he announced as House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) signaled a willingness to bring such a measure to the floor if it passes out of committee.
Meanwhile, the president’s spokesman, Angel Ureña, reacted to Comer’s X post, claiming, “We never said no to a transcript. Interviews are on the record and under oath. Whether it was written or typed isn’t why this is happening. If that were the last or only issue, we’d be in a different position. You keep misdirecting to protect you-know-who, and God knows what.”
A week prior, the Clintons had published a letter to Comer on X, fearmongering over federal immigration enforcement with a reference to the death of an anti-U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activist before arguing, “As chairman of this powerful congressional committee, you have immense power to target anyone and subject them to closed-door interrogation and more.”
This is not about Right or Left, it’s about Right and Wrong. pic.twitter.com/IVQh3yHEGG
— Bill Clinton (@BillClinton) January 13, 2026
The letter further claimed that the committee’s subpoenas were “legally invalid,” chastised Comer for not addressing the Justice Department’s failure to release the Epstein Files, and suggested the chairman would halt Congress “to pursue a rarely used process literally designed to result in our imprisonment.”
Oversight Committee ranking member California Rep. Robert Garcia (D) similarly challenged the chair for his focus, wondering on CNN, “While Comer continues partisan attacks on many people, particularly Democrats, he has done little to bring in the folks that know the most. What about Ghislaine Maxwell? Here is Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator. Why not bring her in to be deposed in front of the committee? What about [Attorney General] Pam Bondi, who’s released one percent of the files?”
Of course, given the perceived track record on accountability, many reserved lauds for Comer until such time that they might see “orange jumpsuits.”
Only when they are both in orange jumpsuits will I ever believe what the GOP republican party has to say or do
— Patrick Laidlaw (@patrick_laidlaw) January 21, 2026
Shut up talking and arrest them!
— Rebel Ro (@45RebelRo) January 21, 2026
Arrest them!
— Brett Thomas (@BrettTh33307153) January 21, 2026
Anxious to see just how far this goes, betting not far
— Robert Warner (@Rwarner42) January 20, 2026
Native of Brooklyn, NY, Kevin Haggerty is a graduate of Hunter College where he studied Cultural Anthropology and Geography. An avid reader and truth seeker, he currently resides in Texas with his wife and their dog and, when he isn't researching current events and their impacts, you'll find him spending time with friends and family or working on his next novel.
- Federal agent hospitalized in LA after violent attack by anti-ICE mob - February 14, 2026
- ‘Defeated Biden inflation crisis’: CNN reports lowest inflation since March 2021 under Trump - February 14, 2026
- Bessent demands Senate GOP nuke filibuster for voter ID bill: ‘The prisoner’s dilemma…kill or be killed!’ - February 14, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.