Does Trump’s new pick for surgeon general get an F when it comes to all things MAHA?

President Donald Trump has once again run afoul of his MAHA coalition after congressional stonewalling forced a third nomination for surgeon general.

Late last week, the chief executive and his Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. slammed Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy (R), faulting him for “sabotaging” the appointment of Dr. Casey Means.

As upset as Make America Healthy Again proponents were for losing that fight, many expressed feelings of betrayal as Trump tapped radiologist, Fox News contributor and known vaccine proponent Dr. Nicole Saphier as his latest pick for the role.

Following the president’s announcement, Kennedy issued a statement with his own support for the “long-time warrior for the MAHA movement,” touting her experience with early detection and disease prevention as a means to tackle the “chronic disease epidemic.”

While MAHA stalwarts recognized the positives of Saphier, many could not look past the glaring negatives, including Turning Point USA’s Alex Clark, who posted to X, “The new surgeon general nominee … may have a great pro-life testimony, but she gets an F when it comes to all things MAHA.”

“Does the president realize that she completely trashed him and @SecKennedy on everything they’ve been doing concerning autism? She wrote an entire op-ed for @WSJ a few WEEKS ago called ‘The Madness in RFK Jr.’s Autism Method’. She is one of the most pro-vaccine advocates in medicine, even defending Hep B on the first day of life,” continued Clark. “Dr. Saphier would be a catastrophic mistake on messaging and communicating with MAHA at a time where the coalition is very fragile. It will be perceived as the admin breaking another promise to them and embracing the status quo in health care that ended us smack dab in the middle of the chronic disease epidemic we now find ourselves in.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“My position isn’t to replace Dr. Saphier. It’s to completely DOGE the Surgeon General role. If we don’t, we risk accelerating the loss of one of the most activated voting blocs the GOP is already watching slip away,” she added.

That position was echoed by fellow MAHA advocate Vani Hari, who reacted to a past post from Saphier highlighted by attorney Tom Renz.

“Can anyone explain how this clown is being nominated for Surgeon General? This statement should disqualify her from practicing medicine, yet Trump nominates her for SG? This is literally insane and absolutely NOT MAHA,” said the lawyer who defended against COVID tyranny to Saphier, posting about a “Covid breakthrough” despite being “fully vaccinated.”

Hari wrote over both, “Doge the SG!!!!”

ADVERTISEMENT

Prior to the withdrawal of Means nomination, Trump had initially picked Dr. Janette Nesheiwat for the role. Both his and Kennedy’s dissatisfaction with having to change plans was stated publicly, with the president lashing out at Cassidy’s “intransigence and political games.”

The secretary added, “By sabotaging this appointment, Bill Cassidy once again did the dirty work for entrenched interests seeking to stall the MAHA movement and protect the very status quo that has made America the sickest nation on earth.”

Saphier’s nomination followed the equally contentious nomination of Dr. Erica Schwartz to serve as U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director, likewise the third pick for the role during Trump’s second administration. Schwartz played a key role in the first administration during the COVID response in large-scale ordering of tests.

ADVERTISEMENT

Noting that vaccine freedom is a preeminent concern for MAHA, Dr. Robert Malone’s early assessment of Saphier described her record as “genuinely mixed.”

Juxtaposing her position that COVID boosters for young children was a “political stunt” with her more recent promotion of the MMR vaccine as “important and lifesaving,” Malone wrote, “Read as a totality, the position is what I would call moderate-MAHA. She is pro-individual-vaccine on the merits. She is supportive of parental autonomy on schedule. She is critical of universal pediatric mandates absent benefit data. She is explicitly sympathetic to MAHA’s vaccine-safety-surveillance reform agenda. She is not, in any reading I can construct from the documentary record, an anti-vaccine voice in the medical-freedom register that, say, Children’s Health Defense operates in. She is also not, in any reading I can construct, a CDC-establishment-defending voice of the kind Cassidy is looking for.”

Ongoing reactions on social media were likewise mixed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Kevin Haggerty

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles