The Supreme Court has rejected an attempt by the GOP to block improperly completed provisional ballots in Pennsylvania from being counted.
Last week, the Republican National Committee and the Pennsylvania Republican Party filed an emergency motion with the Supreme Court requesting it impose a temporary injunction on a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling from the week prior.
“Pennsylvania’s supreme court ruled [on Oct. 23rd that] citizens have a right to vote by provisional ballot if their mail-in ballot is disqualified for a failure to return it in the required secrecy envelope,” as reported by State Court Report.
“Counting Electors’ provisional ballots, when their mail ballots are void for failing to use a Secrecy Envelope, is a statutory right,” Justice Christine Donohue wrote for the majority.
NEW: The RNC files an emergency stay application with the U.S. Supreme Court to override a ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court allowing provisional ballots to be cast on Election Day if a voter fails to follow instructions while casting mail-in ballots. pic.twitter.com/HbQr5PZ7np
— Alex Salvi (@alexsalvinews) October 29, 2024
Republicans argued that if a provisional ballot isn’t properly stuffed into the secrecy envelope, then the ballot shouldn’t count. The federal Supreme Court didn’t necessarily disagree with this assertion.
“In a brief statement attached to the court’s order, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote that the case was ‘a matter of considerable importance,'” according to The New York Times. “But he said the justices had no way to give the Republicans what they were asking for — a statewide block on allowing these provisional ballots.”
“Only Butler County elections officials were parties to the case, he wrote, which meant the justices could not force elections officials in other counties to block those ballots. He was joined by two other conservative justices, Clarence Thomas and Neil M. Gorsuch,” the Times’ reporting continues.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court has denied the RNC’s bid to block potentially “tens of thousands” of Pennsylvania voters who submitted faulty mail ballots from casting provisional ballots on Election Day. There are no dissents. #SCOTUS https://t.co/Eb1aVTV1BG pic.twitter.com/C7hsMQeRbR
— Jimmy Hoover (@JimmyHooverDC) November 1, 2024
Democrats celebrated the ruling.
“In Pennsylvania and across the country, Trump and his allies are trying to make it harder for your vote to count, but our institutions are stronger than his shameful attacks,” Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign said in a statement.
“Today’s decision confirms that for every eligible voter, the right to vote means the right to have your vote counted,” the statement continued.
BREAKING: Supreme Court DENIES Republican’s emergency motion to block Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision ordering county to permit voters with technical errors in mail-in ballots to vote provisional ballots.
A BIG victory for PA voters. https://t.co/EOfDQkLqR4
— Marc E. Elias (@marceelias) November 1, 2024
The RNC said it was “disappointed” in the ruling.
Conservatives on social media, meanwhile, worried that the ruling might make it even easier for voter fraud to be committed.
Look:
Ah, so all fraudulent ballots will be counted.
— Conservative Dude (@swterry911) November 2, 2024
It’s very very simple to follow the rules ffs. This just opens up massive fraud.
— Lhop (@Lhop963) November 2, 2024
The Supreme Court isn’t always the ‘Font of all wisdom’. In my opinion, its position is wrong. No Court, however ‘Supreme’, should be allowed to overrule the People.
— John Welsh (@JohnWelsh11960) November 2, 2024
How can anyone continue to say we have free and fair elections when the highest court in the land allows outright voter fraud?
This along with all the fraudulent activities and the Democrats suing to keep illegals voting.— Kildzr (@kildzr) November 1, 2024
Despite this setback, there has been some good news. On October 25th, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Mississippi mail-in ballots that arrive past Election Day can’t be counted.
In its decision, the 5th Circuit quoted Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
“As Justice Kavanaugh recently emphasized: ‘To state the obvious, a State cannot conduct an election without deadlines … A deadline is not unconstitutional merely because of voters’ own failures to take timely steps to ensure their franchise,'” the appeals court ruled.
“Federal law requires voters to take timely steps to vote by Election Day. And federal law does not permit the State of Mississippi to extend the period for voting by one day, five days, or 100 days,” their ruling continued.
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.