Judicial activism found a Biden-appointed judge asserting a cabinet secretary’s decisions were “likely” based on “hostility to nonwhite immigrants” to safeguard against Haitian deportations.
More than a year into President Donald Trump’s second administration, leftist lawfare continues to obstruct efforts to restore national sovereignty and reverse the damages wrought by globalist policies. The latest instance came as U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia Judge Ana Reyes blocked the end of Temporary Protected Status for over 350,000 Haitians, with added commentary about Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in a case now bound for the Supreme Court.
“There is an old adage among lawyers. If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither, pound the table,” wrote Reyes, a Uruguayan-born, openly homosexual judge appointed by Biden. “Secretary Noem, the record to-date shows, does not have the facts on her side–or at least has ignored them. Does not have the law on her side–or at least has ignored it. Having neither and bringing the adage into the 21st century, she pounds X (f/k/a Twitter).”
Reacting to the order preventing the termination of TPS set for February 3, DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin wrote on X, “Supreme Court, here we come. This is lawless activism that we will be vindicated on.”
Supreme Court, here we come.
This is lawless activism that we will be vindicated on.
Haiti’s TPS was granted following an earthquake that took place over 15 years ago, it was never intended to be a de facto amnesty program, yet that’s how previous administrations have used it… https://t.co/wejySOSaXJ
— Tricia McLaughlin (@TriciaOhio) February 3, 2026
“Haiti’s TPS was granted following an earthquake that took place over 15 years ago, it was never intended to be a de facto amnesty program, yet that’s how previous administrations have used it for decades,” she went on. “Temporary means temporary and the final word will not be from an activist judge legislating from the bench.”
Within the filing, Reyes, the same judge who blocked the president’s ban on transgenders in the military, took particular umbrage with Noem’s December post recommending a “full travel ban on every damn country that’s been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies.”
Noem: ‘full travel ban on every damn country that’s been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies’ https://t.co/NC3ZAwWHBR
— BPR (@BIZPACReview) December 2, 2025
“Our forefathers built this nation on blood, sweat, and the unyielding love of freedom–not foreign invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS. WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE,” the secretary continued, prompting the judge to point out that the five plaintiffs in the suit, who would impact tens of thousands, included a neuroscientist, a software engineer, a laboratory assistant, a college economics major, and a registered nurse.
Meanwhile, as Reyes’ lawsuit alleged Noem’s decision to terminate TPS was “preordained … because of hostility to nonwhite immigrants. This seems substantially likely.”
She went on to contend that “the balance of equities and public interest favor a stay” as reactions on social media favored seeing consequences for judicial activists.
There must be consequences for this activist judge’s continuous rogue and lawless decisions. She must be impeached and removed from the bench.
— Griftocracy™ (@TheGriftocracy) February 3, 2026
How can we purge these judges.
— brumars (@brumarsh) February 3, 2026
Lectures from trial judges to the executive branch are getting very old. These aren’t judges. They’re activists craving attention.
— Draugr (@DraugrMan) February 3, 2026
SCOTUS needs to smack down this ongoing judicial coup
— Julie H Wright✝️⭐️⭐️⭐️🥋 (@juliew38138) February 3, 2026
One would think that the Supreme Court would get sick and tired of having to constantly make these rulings to these lower court judges that they would actually do something about it. To keep this from happening.
— Ryan Davidson🇺🇸 (@Ryanhdd) February 3, 2026
Yeah, they need to go back because Haiti is Great Already pic.twitter.com/TLAhFXTr9d
— Samantha Brown (@samthelion79) February 3, 2026
- Schumer tries to burn Hegseth on spending; finds out it dwarfs compared to his massive Obamacare fraud - March 17, 2026
- Anti-ICE lawbreakers help child rape suspect evade arrest for weeks - March 17, 2026
- ‘Okay, that wasn’t public’: Trump accidentally reveals ill GOP Rep ‘would be dead by June’ - March 17, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
