Get the latest BPR news delivered free to your inbox daily. SIGN UP HERE
Democrats continue to double down on their war against parents, with the latest attack coming from a Wisconsin State legislator who on Thursday told parents who’d like to “have a say” in their children’s education to pay for said education themselves.
“If parents want to ‘have a say’ in their child’s education, they should home school or pay for private school tuition out of their family budget,” Wisconsin State Assemblywoman Lee Snodgrass tweeted early Thursday afternoon.
Critics, of which there were many, interpreted her tweet as meaning that tax-paying parents who don’t want their children to be indoctrinated by taxpayer-funded public schools should invest in private education, while still paying taxes to the state.
The tweet provoked so much backlash that Snodgrass deleted it within the hour, but not before her numerous critics were able to screenshot it:
Honestly thought @RepSnodgrass was a parody account when I first saw it because I can’t believe Democrats are still doing this to themselves. (she deleted it) pic.twitter.com/sDXUGnQN2I
— Rory Cooper (@rorycooper) February 10, 2022
The backlash was twofold. Some critics accused her of being indifferent to the concerns of poor parents who can’t afford private schooling. Other critics zeroed in on her tacit support for children being indoctrinated with pseudo-intellectual “poison.”
Here’s a bit of the backlash:
This is insanity on the part of @RepSnodgrass and is not subject to misinterpretation. This is a Leftist telling Wisconsinites to butt out of their kids’ education so other Leftists can teach them intellectual poison like CRT. This has to stop and it’s why I’m running for #wigov. pic.twitter.com/btqngdFRev
— Kevin Nicholson (@KevinMNicholson) February 10, 2022
Wisconsin Representative Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) tweeted and then quickly deleted a powerful reminder that Democrats believe you have no say in your children’s education if you send them to a public school. pic.twitter.com/464x9HUeng
— Dan O’Donnell (@DanODonnellShow) February 10, 2022
So, @RepSnodgrass deleted this tweet. No wonder. It’s astoundingly tone deaf – choosing to support freedom only for the rich & forcing everyone to subsidize indoctrination of children through forced taxation without “having a say.” #EducationFreedom pic.twitter.com/CUiTJhOLAo
— Chip Roy (@chiproytx) February 10, 2022
— Kimberly Ross (@SouthernKeeks) February 10, 2022
Snodgrass’s tweet was posted amid an ongoing nationwide war between parents who want more say in their children’s education and those who disagree.
Some parents want the option to decide for themselves whether or not their children should be masked up while at school. Other parents want the choice to opt their children out of being taught divisive concepts, including (racial essentialism) and radical LGBT ideology.
Democrats on the national, state and local level, in addition to teachers’ unions and far-left activists, have aligned themselves against parents on both issues.
Snodgrass included:
Imagine if every parent in WI screaming at local school boards about mask requirements were as upset about how schools are under funded… pic.twitter.com/bNL6MzGpHq
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) August 26, 2021
A THREAD: This is GOP politics in Madison. Yesterday Re. Cabral Guevara circulated co-Sponsorship of LRB 4659/1: relating to: gender identity and sexual orientation programs in schools.
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) September 15, 2021
This bill would make it so parents could opt students out of programming related to sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or gender expression.
In a normal world, a bill is circulated for co-sponsorships for 2 weeks and then assigned a bill number and sent to a committee.
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) September 15, 2021
We are not living in a normal world in WI. This bill (and other terrible bills) was SCHEDULED FOR A HEARING the day after it was introduced. That’s tomorrow (Sept. 16) for those following along. Unbelievable. This means most who may want to testify will not even know about it.
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) September 15, 2021
The “terrible bill” that Snodgrass referenced in the tweets above would, as an example, stop teachers from telling mentally ill children that they may pick a gender on a whim.
Democrats claim this never happens, but the abundant evidence says otherwise:
Just ran into a friend who’s kid was told by a Palo Alto school she can pick a “gender” at 12 without discussing w her parents.She chose to be a male. 🤔She is deeply depressed, resorted to cutting herself & has had suicidal ideation. Her Indian parents, grandparents & https://t.co/o6ZCzG9HqJ
— Asha Jadeja Motwani 🇮🇳🇺🇸 (@ashajadeja325) February 10, 2022
one other relative are falling apart. Therapy has not really helped. I don’t get all this stuff, but do feel that schools MUST involve at least one parent or grandparent in such important matters. They are all quite liberal & support LGBTQ rights.
— Asha Jadeja Motwani 🇮🇳🇺🇸 (@ashajadeja325) February 10, 2022
After deleting her original tweet Thursday, Snodgrass tried backtracking by claiming the tweet had been “lacking in nuance” and was being “easily misinterpreted.”
She also argued that every parent already has a say thanks to their right to vote for school board members, join a local parent-teacher organization and meet with teachers, and that the real issue is the underfunding of public schools.
FYI, even far-left TV hosts like Chris Hayes have raised concerns over the billions in COVID relief money that was doled out to schools across the country amid the pandemic, only to be used to fund bonuses for themselves.
View the Wisconsin legislator’s backtracking thread below:
I deleted my Tweet since it was lacking in nuance and easily misinterpreted. I wouldn’t want anyone to think that parents do not have a role in their child’s public education-I sure did. I encourage all parents to engage in voting for school board, join PTO and meet with teachers
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) February 10, 2022
To clarify, My point is we should be fully funding our public schools and that diverting funds away from our public schools only makes it harder for parents to have the relationships we deserve with our kids’ teachers and their schools.
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) February 10, 2022
Of course parents need to have a say in their kids’ education and their classrooms! I’m a parent, and I have a say, as should every parent. I shouldn’t have been cavalier or glib—that wasn’t my intention, and I apologize. Carry on!
— Rep. Lee Snodgrass (@RepSnodgrass) February 10, 2022
The thread did nothing to appease her critics. They fired back by arguing that she’d said “the quiet part out loud” and that, despite her talk of “nuance,” her original tweets had laid bare the truth about how the Democrat Party really feels.
And indeed, they had evidence to prove their point. It turns out that about a month ago, the Michigan Democratic Party had made the exact same “point” on Facebook.
The party wrote at the time that “parents do have the option to choose to send their kids to a hand-selected private school at their own expense” and that the “purpose of a public education in a public school is not to teach kids only what parents want them to be taught. It is to teach them what society needs them to know.”
Like Snodgrass’s tweet, that post was also eventually deleted:
We have deleted a post that ignored the important role parents play—and should play—in Michigan public schools. Parents…
Posted by Michigan Democratic Party on Monday, January 17, 2022
Too little, too late Michigan Democratic Party. Whose views exactly are you representing here, then? Please tell us,…
Posted by Ryan D. Kelley for 50th Governor of Michigan on Monday, January 17, 2022
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.