The party of pronouns and pandering reportedly had a new eight-figure prospectus as Democratic desperation sought to uncover the secret on “Speaking with American Men.”
After years spent lacking the capability to answer the question “What is a woman?” and having deployed Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, of all people, to “code talk to white guys,” the Democratic Party appears to be falling back into a tired routine. Rather than admit the faults that brought the world “White Dudes for Harris” and the party’s worst approval numbers in history, at least $20 million was reportedly being flushed into studies relating to young men.
As detailed by the New York Times national political correspondent Shane Goldmacher, “Democratic donors and strategists have been gathering at luxury hotels to discuss how to win back working-class voters, commissioning new projects that can read like anthropological studies of people from faraway places.”
“The prospectus for one new $20 million effort, obtained by the Times, aims to reverse the erosion of Democratic support among young men, especially online,” he continued. “It is code-named SAM — short for ‘Speaking with American Men: A Strategic Plan’ — and promises investment to ‘study the syntax, language, and content that gains attention and virality in these spaces.’ It recommends buying advertisements in video games, among other things.”
“Above all,” the plan stated, “we must shift from a moralizing tone.”
The report comes amid numerous admissions of failure on the part of the Democratic Party, including Walz’s address at the Harvard Kennedy School, where he’d admitted his DEI role on the ticket for the 2024 presidential campaign.
“I also was on the ticket, quite honestly, because I could code talk to white guys watching football, fixing their truck, doing that, then I could put them at ease. I was the permission structure to say you can do this and vote for this,” said the governor, “and you look across those swing states, with the exception of Minnesota, we didn’t get enough of those votes.”
Walz admits he was essentially a ‘DEI pick’ for the Harris campaign https://t.co/bevu9Q1EU2 via @BIZPACReview
— BPR based (@DumpstrFireNews) April 30, 2025
Walz, the “man enough” promotion and comedian Will Ferrell seemingly threatening voters to support Harris or be held “personally responsible,” weren’t the only examples of disconnect.
Last week, the Times also reported that Democratic mega-donors have an interest in emptying out their pockets to counter “G.O.P. clout online,” with hopes of finding “the liberal Joe Rogan.” The laughable assertion reinforced how Democrats refused to accept that their problem wasn’t with what they keep selling, only in how they are selling it.
How Dems are stepping up the search for ‘liberal Joe Rogan’ is hilarious https://t.co/FSvyG5nN3d via @BIZPACReview
— BPR based (@DumpstrFireNews) May 21, 2025
Democratic consultant Anat Shenker-Osorio told the Times, “The party is doing a lot of navel-gazing and not enough full-belly acting.”
Roughly 250 focus groups found “Republicans are seen as ‘apex predators,’ like lions, tigers, and sharks — beasts that take what they want when they want it. Democrats are typically tagged as tortoises, slugs, or sloths: slow, plodding, passive.”
Meanwhile, following his own proposed $20 million effort to challenge the status quo within the party by issuing primary challenges to incumbents, failed pillow entrepreneur David Hogg added failed Democratic National Committee vice chair to his resume as his election to the position was voided.
Among the voices on the left who’ve abandoned the Democratic Party, “The Young Turks” Executive Producer Ana Kasparian, who jumped ship over gender ideology, told SiriusXM host Megyn Kelly last week about how the party struggles with self-reflection.
Addressing why she speaks out, hoping “they’ll heed the advice,” Kasparian told Kelly, “But instead what I’ve noticed by the Democratic Party is that rather than self-reflect, they like to lash out. They see us as their public servants, instead of them being our public servants. And that is a huge, huge problem.”
As it happened, the report itself had a correction after one voter researcher spoken with was originally cited as a woman, “The person was a man, not a woman.”
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.