The trial of Daniel Penny, the Marine veteran charged with manslaughter for the death of Jordan Neely, appears to be far from concluding.
After a four-week-long trial, the jury in the Daniel Penny case has reportedly informed the judge that they are unable to reach a decision regarding the second-degree manslaughter charge.
Watch:
#BREAKING: After 3 days of deliberations, Daniel Penny jurors have informed the judge they are DEADLOCKED on the second degree manslaughter charge
They will most likely be forced by the judge to continue deliberating.
FREE DANIEL PENNY!
pic.twitter.com/7v6hHxmac0— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) December 6, 2024
District Attorney Alvin Bragg has come under fire for even bringing charges against Penny in the first place, as even the passengers who were on the subway at the time of the incident described the veteran’s behavior as “really respectful.” Neely, they say, was being disorderly and had straphangers “scared s**tless.”
Now, with the jury unable to make a decision, legal scholar Jonathan Turley weighs in on what America can expect:
“The jury just sent a note to the court that it is deadlocked on the first count, the second-degree manslaughter charge. The court will likely now issue an Allen charge to get them to resume deliberations,” he wrote in an X post.
The jury just sent a note to the court that it is deadlocked on the first count, the second-degree manslaughter charge. The court will likely now issue an Allen charge to get them to resume deliberations…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 6, 2024
“The question is whether the court will instruct the jury to consider the second charge of the criminal negligence charge. The judge expressed doubt over whether, in the absence of a unanimous verdict on the first charge, he could tell them to move on to the second charge,” he continued. “Many of us cannot see how this case could have produced a conviction with the layers of reasonable doubt in the evidence. The absence of clear causation makes a conviction difficult to justify in such a case. Indeed, it makes it difficult to see why the case was brought.”
…Many of us cannot see how this case could have produced a conviction with the layers of reasonable doubt in the evidence. The absence of clear causation makes a conviction difficult to justify in such a case. Indeed, it makes it difficult to see why the case was brought.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 6, 2024
“The criminal negligence charge was always the more menacing option given the lower standard. Bragg clearly hoped that the jury could reject the top charge and compromise on the second charge. That could still prove to be the case depending on the approach of the court.”
…The criminal negligence charge was always the more menacing option given the lower standard. Bragg clearly hoped that the jury could reject the top charge and compromise on the second charge. That could still prove to be the case depending on the approach of the court.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 6, 2024
X users weighed in on the breaking news:
And folks wonder why people just stand by and watch crimes happen.
This man is a public hero and should be treated as such…he should have been the example of how the strong should protect the innocent but instead he’s treated like this ..shameful l!!— @warriorbranduk (@JassmSmith) December 6, 2024
This is disappointing for an innocent man, given video, forensic evidence, and the background of the attacker who started this.
— George M. Nicholas (@GeogeM3) December 6, 2024
He should be acquitted!
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) December 6, 2024
New York jury just dead locks on the first charge the main charge. Which means that New York continues to shoot themselves in the foot. The fact that this guy isn’t totally acquitted means forget anybody trying to save anybody in New York.
— Frank Ferriolo (@Spaceman3810) December 6, 2024
Having been a prosecutor and tried numerous criminal cases you learn that a jury of twelve people, with different backgrounds, cultures and life experiences, are the ultimate wild card. I lost cases that I should have won and won cases I should have lost.
— Greg A Jennings (@GregJenningsEsq) December 6, 2024
If the jury can’t come to a unanimous decision, dismiss the case.
— Based Electrician⚡️ (@RyanHugeBrain) December 6, 2024
I’m just glad there are jurors committed to his innocence if the evidence calls for it, as it truly seems like he’s being crucified for having simply tried to protect people.
— TheModernFederalist (@ModernFed) December 6, 2024
- Cornered Scarborough tries to justify his praise of Biden’s mental acuity after scathing op-ed - January 15, 2025
- Megyn Kelly goes scorched earth on ‘overweight, out-of-shape, women’ in the LA fire department - January 15, 2025
- One of the vilest anti-Trump actors in Hollywood just turned on Newsom and it’s ugly - January 15, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.