NYT called out by journalism professor for alleged ‘both-sides’ reporting sure to destroy democracy

With the left having staked out the moral high ground in post-Obama America, there is no need for the media to present both sides of a story any more and those who dare to venture into a more balanced presentation of the news can find themselves being targeted — there’s a reason the radical left labels the opposition as Nazis.

On Monday, NYU journalism professor Jay Rosen took to Twitter to call attention to the New York Times using the “depends on who you ask” strategy, referencing an article titled, “Fears Over Fate of Democracy Leave Many Voters Frustrated and Resigned.”

“As democracy frays around them, Republicans and Democrats see different culprits and different risks,” the subtitle declared, in a piece detailing how voters in Wisconsin see democracy under attack — while we are a republic, not a democracy, IF our “democracy” is at risk that risk would begin with one political party weaponizing various federal agencies to attack political opponents.

“The ‘depends on who you ask’ device is one of the surest indicators of an oncoming both-sides-do-it frame,” Rosen tweeted, linking to the article above. “Here, Democrats are frustrated by the gerrymander. Republicans are just as frustrated by school teachers, college professors and media personalities.”

In sharing a snippet of the article, the professor helped elevate right-wing stereotypes, but NY Times reporter Jonathan Weisman took heat anyway for equating “legitimate fears with illegitimate ones,” as the editor of Press Watch, Dan Froomkin, surmised — this being relevant only in the circumstance that the left gets to choose between the two.

“Let’s be clear. Saying that something factual ‘depends on who you talk to’ is not accurate,” Froomkin wrote, making it clear that those who may hold a different view than him deserve no voice at all.

“[W]hat Weisman was doing – knowingly, with a smirk – was suggesting it’s a toss-up between those terrified by the very real possibility of the Republican Party seizing absolute power, on the one hand, and right-wing conspiracy theorists who see brown people and socialist elites as scary, on the other,” he added, securing his radical left bona fides.

This take playing out on social media as intended:

Here’s a sampling of other responses from the voices those on the left would prefer were silenced:


If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.

Thank you for your donation!
Tom Tillison


We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles