Dr. Tracy Høeg was the senior author of a 2020 Wisconsin study that looked at COVID-19 cases and transmission in 17 K-12 schools.
So, when Randi Weingarten, the president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the second-largest teacher’s labor union in the country, cited Høeg’s study “multiple times as evidence schools needed ‘layered mitigation’ to reopen” following the pandemic lockdowns, the scientist’s ears likely perked up — and for good reason.
Weingarten, who fiercely fought to keep kids from going back to their classrooms, mentioned Høeg by name in her written testimony to the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, and according to the epidemiologist, “her interpretation of our study are incorrect.”
https://twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1651410620577906689?s=20
In a lengthy, brutal thread, Høeg ripped into Weingarten’s testimony, shredding the union leader’s remarks, along with the scraps of her crumbled credibility.
The Wisconsin study, Høeg stated, “had no control group.”
“It was not possible to determine the specific roles that mask-wearing and other disease mitigation strategies played in the low rate of disease spread, and information on school ventilation systems was not obtained,” the paper, published online in January 2021, clearly reads.
“In other words because we had no unmasked control group, our study did not show masks prevented transmission,” Høeg tweeted. “It amazes me this is so difficult for people to understand.”
“The rate of transmission may have been the same or even lower without masks,” she stated. “Who knows.”
In other words because we had no unmasked control group, our study did not show masks prevented transmission
It amazes me this is so difficult for people to understand. The rate of transmission may have been the same or even lower without masks. Who knowshttps://t.co/vh6sgpIIT2— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) April 27, 2023
Høeg pointed to studies from Sweden and Norway that indicated “masks weren’t necessary.”
But, if Weingarten or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had questions about the safety of letting school children eat their lunches indoors or the necessity of keeping them six feet apart, they could have simply asked the study authors.
The @CDCgov & @AFTunion also could have asked us study authors about things like eating lunch indoors, distancing and ventilation in our Wisconsin study (which we ended up outlining here because they never asked) https://t.co/7Kfhmec9UE)
— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) April 27, 2023
According to Høeg, 90% of elementary kids in the 13-week study sat less than six feet apart from one another, and they ate lunch inside. Half of the schools hadn’t installed new ventilation systems.
The results contradicted the need for any mitigation efforts.
“We saw remarkably low in school transmission & no known transmission to teachers,” Høeg stated.
In our 13 weeks WI study (8-11/2020)
published by @CDCMMWR
>90% of elementary classes kids sat <6 feet apart
Kids ate lunch indoors
>50% of the schools hadn’t installed new ventilation systems
& we saw remarkably low in school transmission & no known transmission to teachers— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) April 27, 2023
Between the CDC, who repeatedly told Americans they needed to “follow The Science,” and the AFT, “millions” of American children suffered.
“The fact the @CDCgov was taking the advice of the @AFTunion & not the scientists publishing on this topic in their own journal and without considering the data from Europe seems to have played a role in the massive error that left millions US kids out of school unnecessarily,” Høeg wrote.
“The way Ms Weingarten mentioned me in her testimony, one might have thought I was being consulted all along but this was not the case,” she continued. “The first time I met with her I voiced my disagreement about masking children in school along with @DrJBhattacharya in Sept 2021!”
The way Ms Weingarten mentioned me in her testimony, one might have thought I was being consulted all along but this was not the case.
The first time I met with her I voiced my disagreement about masking children in school along with @DrJBhattacharya in Sept 2021! pic.twitter.com/GJrqhGYqQx
— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) April 27, 2023
Dr. Høeg stopped just shy of calling Weingarten a straight-up liar.
“Despite the wording in @rweingarten’s written testimony, I consistently *disagreed* w/ what she & AFT were requesting in terms of mitigation to reopen schools & I’ve said that consistently (on social media, in op-eds, on news interviews) since our study was published,” she stated.
“I don’t agree w/how our study & I am being used to make it seem we needed more mitigation before full reopening; no-in fact the *delay* that was perilous,” Høeg wrote. “Ultimately @CDCgov faltered because they looked to AFT instead of European & US data.”
“Our kids,” she concluded, “paid an unnecessary price.”
I don't agree w/how our study & I am being used to make it seem we needed more mitigation before full reopening; no-in fact the *delay* that was perilous
Ultimately @CDCgov faltered because they looked to AFT instead of European & US data
Our kids paid an unnecessary price
End
— Tracy Høeg, MD, PhD (@TracyBethHoeg) April 27, 2023
While Høeg may have avoided the “L” word, those who read her thread used it with abandon.
Listen up y'all. @rweingarten is a liar. https://t.co/0m3898YKx5
— ITRando (@it_rando) April 27, 2023
Jeez… @rweingarten is such a liar.
I'd love to see some of the DMN EdLab'rs report on this. @EvaMarieAyala @valeriaoliesc I know it doesn't fit your narrative, but it seems important when the Teacher's Union President is being called out for her lies. https://t.co/OScLHZL4gZ
— NFL Picks Pro (@NFLProPicks) April 27, 2023
https://twitter.com/StevenRosenblum/status/1651957823847247872?s=20
“The only thing @rweingarten is good at is attempting to spin things to benefit her,” one Twitter user wrote. “She doesn’t ever succeed, but she certainly puts forth an effort in her attempts.”
The only thing @rweingarten is good at is attempting to spin things to benefit her. She doesn’t ever succeed, but she certainly puts forth an effort in her attempts.
— Dawn Iannaco-Hahn, LCPC (@Dawn_LCPC) April 27, 2023
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- Trump indictment bad for Hillary: ‘Is the statute of limitations up?’ - June 9, 2023
- FBI finally shows doc, reveals Burisma bribery scheme alleges 5 million paid to EACH Biden - June 9, 2023
- Female-only nude spa forced to remove references to ‘biological women’, adopt ‘inclusive’ policy after trans complains - June 8, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.