A letter with workplace demands was quickly retracted by Capitol Hill progressive staffers, but not before sending a clear message to DOGE.
At the behest of President-elect Donald Trump, the proposed Department of Government Efficiency had set a target of $2 trillion in cuts from the federal budget by July 2026. So when the Congressional Progressive Staff Association’s (CPSA) call for shorter workweeks promised the same or better productivity, they were quick to retract their demand after seemingly drawing a target on their own backs on where to start eliminating waste.
Referring to their Friday statement as a “response” to their own Thursday letter submitted to congressional leaders and all members of the 119th Congress, the CPSA said in part on their withdrawal, “The letter failed to make two things clear: First, that progressive congressional staff are dedicated to serving the American people no matter how many hours it takes to get the job done. Second, that there are well-known, longstanding workplace issues that deserve Congress’s immediate attention if it wishes to effectively serve the people.”
“We are ready to continue the urgent task of serving our bosses’ constituents and advancing the causes that put working-class people first,” the statement added. “CPSA is looking forward to continuing to support staff in their efforts to address these critical workplace issues.”
The Congressional Progressive Staff Association released the following statement in response to its January 16th letter about a rotating 32-hour workweek for staff. pic.twitter.com/BBPJVeSnSx
— Congressional Progressive Staff Association (@cpsaDC) January 17, 2025
Within the letter, the staffers had insisted they continue to receive the same pay despite demanding their availability be cut by 20% and said, “We write today to encourage you to consider adopting a proposal that would improve worker satisfaction, increase staff retention in Congress, and model a more sustainable approach to work on a national level.”
Lamenting the labor for staffers in Washington, D.C. as well as those back in the respective representatives’ districts, the CPSA spoke of the routine long hours “at a level of rigor that regularly leads to burnout.”
Claiming that the reduced hours often resulted in increased productivity when workplaces had tried a 32-hour workweek model, the letter insisted, “Working 32 hours, employees have a more substantial reprieve from work and therefore are able to complete the same tasks in less time.”
The suggestion from the organization came as heavy scrutiny was already being applied to federal workers, including by Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst (R), founder of the Senate DOGE Caucus, who’d released a report late in 2024 exposing and unloading on telework.
“If federal employees can’t be found at their desks, exactly where are they?” asked the report that highlighted how officials in President Joe Biden’s administration like Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg weren’t in their offices while connecting telework to breaks in communication that, in one instance, had delayed safety concerns about an infant formula plant reaching the FDA in Oct. 2021.
Reactions to the CPSA letter had many calling for Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, the co-heads of the proposed DOGE, to set their sights on the workloads of staffers to see whether a 20% reduction in staff would be a more cost-effective solution.
“Hey @DOGE if ‘Progressive Hill staff’ can complete their work in 32 hrs/wk, then I think it’s time to downsize and redistribute the work load, to [accommodate] a 40 hr work week, WITHOUT a pay increase,” wrote one X user. “Anyone who gets a government salary, should expect to work at least 40 hrs/wk.”
Hey @DOGE if “Progressive Hill staff” can complete their work in 32 hrs/wk, then I think it’s time to downsize and redistribute the work load, to accomodate a 40 hr work week, WITHOUT a pay increase. Anyone who gets a government salary, should expect to work at least 40 hrs/wk. pic.twitter.com/niB5xDqRLr
— Redpills 4 All ☕️ (@RP4All) January 16, 2025
Love how no one actually put their name on it. @DOGE here is some more savings. This faction of employees in DC have just outed themselves as being lazy.
— Blyon (@HeartofaLyon2) January 16, 2025
Proving once again that progressives are worthless and useless. Americans are working 2 jobs to make ends meet and these people want to work less for the same pay. There’s a reason they keep losing support.
— Savannah (@BasedSavannah) January 16, 2025
That’s fine … treat them all as part time workers, eliminate any benefits and cut their pay by 30%.
— Douglas Drew (@Douglas_A_Drew) January 16, 2025
“Progressives” regressing back towards minor nobility status with open contempt to the hundreds of millions of lives they ruin annually.
But a 20% reduction in their work week is fine as long as it comes with a 20% reduction in pay. Working less means they’re worth less.
— Progressing California (@ProgressingCali) January 16, 2025
The less these people “work,” the better for the country anyway. I fully support.
— captive dreamer (@captivedreamer7) January 16, 2025
- DOGE discovers $1.9B in tax dollars ‘misplaced’ by Biden regime - February 15, 2025
- Alleged UnitedHealthcare CEO murderer issues first public statement – to fans - February 15, 2025
- Psaki acknowledges Dem failures: ‘Now is the time to break some sh*t’ - February 15, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.