Talk about bad optics, Democrats objected to proposed legislation seeking to toughen the penalty for those convicted of child pornography.
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., requested unanimous consent over his PROTECT Act of 2022, which sets a five-year mandatory minimum sentence for child pornography offenders, and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., rose to object, saying: “I have to ask myself—why now?”
“The horror of child pornography is exponentially worse than it was a decade ago, and judges handing out lenient sentences for these criminals is a big reason why,” Hawley said last week, when introducing the measure. “While the White House continues to dismiss concerns about leniency toward child porn offenders as a ‘desperate conspiracy theory,’ the numbers speak for themselves. Congress must act before this problem becomes even worse.”
Durbin, who is the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman and Democratic whip, said the bill, which was modeled after a similar bill that passed in 2003, “doesn’t reflect the realities of today.”
Senator Dick Durbin is objecting to Senator @HawleyMO's legislation seeking to toughen sentences for child porn offenders:
"These guidelines…don't reflect the reality of today…we now live in a world of internet and access to…thousands of images, if that is your decision." pic.twitter.com/cWovwxPm52
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) April 5, 2022
The Democrat argued that the law was created to address “physical materials,” like videotapes and photos, and that the internet is a gamechanger because child pornography is much easier to obtain.
“We know that in 2005, that decision was handed down. We know in 2012, the Sentencing Commission said to Congress and to the world, you need to do something here. These guidelines that you promulgated don’t reflect the reality of today,” Durbin said.
“The laws were written in an era where the materials we’re talking about were physical materials and we now live in a world of internet and access to … tens of thousands of images if that is your decision,” he added.
Durbin even played the QAnon card: “There are some political groups—at least one well-known political group—that manufactures theories about child pornography and pedophilia and the like, and even inspires deadly reactions to them, and they’re cheering this on.”
(QAnon conspiracists believe high-level government and Hollywood are involved in a vast pedophile ring.)
Of course, Durbin’s real motivation to block the movement likely centers around the confirmation vote later this week over Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, who Republicans have grilled over what they see as lenient sentencing for those convicted of child pornography.
Hawley took to Twitter about his bill being stalled: “I just went to the Senate floor to try to pass a bill toughening sentences on child pornographers. And the Democrats blocked it, again calling the child porn crisis a ‘conspiracy theory.’ And that tells you everything you need to know.”
I just went to the Senate floor to try to pass a bill toughening sentences on child pornographers. And the Democrats blocked it, again calling the child porn crisis a “conspiracy theory.” And that tells you everything you need to know
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) April 5, 2022
Jack Posobiec responded to Durbin’s action in a tweet: “Holy funking shlit.”
Here’s a sampling of other responses to the story from Twitter:
This, this is the hill they are choosing to die on?
— Nathan Knappenburger (@NKnappenburger) April 5, 2022
How is this happening?! We went from two sides having different approaches to the same goal to two completely different realities.
— George Vuckovich (@PGH_Geo) April 5, 2022
The guidelines still require individuals to intentionally seek the material, regardless if virtual or physical photographs. No one is accidentally coming across this stuff and being charged. Anyone who seeks it should be in jail for a LONG time.
— Trey Kinsey (@HalEdwardKinsey) April 5, 2022
We should be MORE strict because it’s easier to access with the internet. I don’t understand this line of thought. This is what KBJ argued as well. We should throw to book at anyone guilty of this not advocate for less sentencing because it’s easier to acquire?
— Patrick Henry (@PHenry_v3) April 5, 2022
Dunno who needs to hear this, but the party that wants to abort healthy babies while they’re being born, indoctrinate kindergartners about sex, send drag queens into libraries, and chemically sterilize adolescents behind their parents’ backs is not a party that cares about kids. https://t.co/04DXeawlqH
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) April 5, 2022
- Trump vindicated once again when German Chancellor admits ‘serious’ mistake on energy - January 16, 2026
- Largest teacher’s union steers millions to shady left-wing social justice causes: report - January 16, 2026
- Demands to ‘nuke zombie filibuster’ grow after latest GOP ‘betrayal’ - January 16, 2026
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.
