Reminiscent of comedian Mike Meyers Saturday Night Live Sketch “Coffee Talk,” the latest woke arguments from one publication about the “racism” of violence in football had readers calling out Scientific American as neither scientific nor American.
Embracing the Marxist tradition of not letting a crisis go to waste, the recent collapse of Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin in the first quarter of his teams matchup with the Cincinnati Bengals was not treated as an opportunity to analyze the myriad medical reasons that the 24-year-old might have suffered injury, but instead as a chance for race-baiting.
On Friday, Duke University assistant professor of cultural anthropology Tracie Canada penned an opinion piece for the outlet entitled “Damar Hamlin’s Collapse Highlights the Violence Black Men Experience in Football” and the swift backlash included former player and NFL coach Tony Dungy who reacted, “As a black man and former NFL player I can say this article is absolutely ridiculous.”
As a black man and former NFL player I can say this article is absolutely ridiculous.
— Tony Dungy (@TonyDungy) January 7, 2023
In the article, Canada wrote, “This ordinary violence has always riddled the sport and it affects all players. But Black players are disproportionately affected. While Black men are severely underrepresented in positions of power across football organizations, such as coaching and management, they are overrepresented on the gridiron. Non-white players account for 70 percent of the NFL; nearly half of all Division I college football players are Black. Further, through a process called racial stacking, coaches racially segregate athletes by playing position. These demographic discrepancies place Black athletes at a higher risk during play.”
It’s important to note that Canada’s research is devoted to the study of sport as it relates to race, gender and the like and she Ph.D. holder from the University of Virginia is working on a book specifically discussing the “experiences of Black college football players,” but even she admitted, in a quote highlighted by one social media user, that she is “not aware of research that compares the rate of injury between Black and white football players, heatstrokes, ACL and labrum tears, ankle sprains, bone breaks, and concussions are just a few of the consequences of how these bodies are used.”
“While I am not aware of research that compares the rate of injury between Black and white football players, heatstrokes, ACL and labrum tears, ankle sprains, bone breaks, and concussions are just a few of the consequences of how these bodies are used.”
— Meme Gene (@pseudnonymus) January 7, 2023
Let me assure you that there are white people lined up miles long to get into this league. To the degree that it’s “disproportionately affecting black men”, it would only be because the black men earned the roster spot the white guys also wanted. This article is pure garbage.
— T.J. Moe (@TJMoe28) January 8, 2023
Calling out the inherent racism of the argument, the account Monitoring Bias reacted to the article with a poll that asked “Should the NFL seek to achieve more equitable racial representation among its players in order to reduce this…unfortunate disproportionality?” with the choices being “No, that would be racist” and “Yes, that would be racist.”
Should the NFL seek to achieve more equitable racial representation among its players in order to reduce this this unfortunate disproportionality?
— Monitoring Bias (@monitoringbias) January 7, 2023
Others rattled off some of the inequities that Canada hadn’t included like monetarily for the majority black league and how other sports should see to it that injuries inflicted on their athletes be more proportionally distributed. Of course, there were other crises that Scientific American hadn’t even bothered to shoehorn into the article and those couldn’t go unmentioned.
So do the paychecks https://t.co/tdOivLEsBG
— jimtreacher.substack.com (@jtLOL) January 7, 2023
Dale Earnhardt was killed because of racism.
— Colonel Joseph Hardin (@ColJosephHardin) January 7, 2023
What is the impact of climate change though
— 7thDegreeWhiteBelt (@AhmadGarza3) January 7, 2023
You guys are one letter away from being “SCAM”
Which sounds way more appropriate here.
— NeaL (@AyeCriMsOn) January 7, 2023
Lest the opinion piece be considered a fluke, Scientific American, which self-describes as “committed to sharing trustworthy knowledge, enhancing our understanding of the world, and advancing social justice,” recently drew attention to an article from 2020 that described combating obesity as rooted in racism which led to similar backlash including one mock quote, “‘Black women should stay overweight and poor because, racism’ — Scientific American.”
“Black women should stay overweight and poor because, racism” – Scientific American
— Brother Seamus (@WaynePelota) December 28, 2022
— Keith Dorschner (@keith_dorschner) January 8, 2023
Not a single number or data point in the article that shows that the injury rate among black players is higher. Yet, it cites a claim that NFL playing fields are not that different from…plantations. What an embarrassment to the word “Scientific” in the journal’s title.
— PhinallyDone (@Phinally_Done) January 7, 2023
— Nick Freitas (@NickForVA) January 8, 2023
— #CMFL (@seeemmeffell) January 7, 2023
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- Sandmann 2.0: Media accuses innocent young sports fan of ‘black face’, plasters him all over internet - November 28, 2023
- ‘Real size’ Miss Universe contestant reacts to haters that body shame her - November 28, 2023
- Jon Lovitz says antisemitism he experienced in Hollywood came ‘from other Jews’ - November 28, 2023
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.