Glenn Greenwald blasted diplomatic correspondent Michael Crowley and The New York Times for the “gigantic” errors he found contained in the “first 3 paragraphs” of an article that referenced former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden.
Greenwald was one of the three journalists who had the courage to break Snowden’s stunning leak of classified documents which proved the NSA was spying on Americans and collecting enormous amounts of data from internet tech giants, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft.
For their efforts, Greenwald, Barton Gellman, and filmmaker Laura Poitras were awarded a Pulitzer Prize.
In his latest article for The Times, titled, “Once Shocking, U.S. Spying on Its Allies Draws a Global Shrug,” journalist Michael Crowley compares the reaction abroad to the recent online leaks of documents related to the United States’ involvement in Ukraine’s war with Russia to the Snowden leak and concludes there has been “limited outrage abroad.”
Unfortunately, it appears Crowley, who “was a Pulitzer Price [sic] finalist for coverage of the Trump administration’s failure to adequately respond to the coronavirus,” according to his Times’ bio, played fast and loose with the facts.
“Holy sh*t,” Greenwald exclaimed on Twitter, “this NYT news article by @michaelcrowley has 2 gigantic, glaring factual errors in the first 3 paragraphs: 1) Snowden didn’t give the archive to WikiLeaks for publication, but rather to me and Laura Poitras. 2) The Merkel story didn’t come from the Snowden archive.”
Holy shit: this NYT news article by @michaelcrowley has 2 gigantic, glaring factual errors in the first 3 paragraphs:
1) Snowden didn't give the archive to WikiLeaks for publication, but rather to me and Laura Poitras.
2) The Merkel story didn't come from the Snowden archive: https://t.co/NV8Oj3l0ty pic.twitter.com/9beBloZQZN
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 14, 2023
He noted that The Times was made aware of the errors by “numerous top editors” but failed to correct them a full twelve hours after the story was published.
“This story was published by the NYT 12 hours ago. Numerous top editors who oversaw publication of our reporting — then-Guardian-editor-in-chief
@janinegibson and Intercept’s @MargotWilliams — quickly corrected them, but the paper ignored it, still has these errors up,” Greenwald wrote.
This story was published by the NYT 12 hours ago. Numerous top editors who oversaw publication of our reporting — then-Guardian-editor-in-chief @janinegibson and Intercept’s @MargotWilliams — quickly corrected them, but the paper ignored it, still has these errors up: pic.twitter.com/uvlo6x3RGn
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 14, 2023
“Of course all journalists and outlets make minor errors but these are major,” Greenwald continued. “No journalist has any business writing about the Snowden reporting if they believe WikiLeaks published it. That’s just massive ignorance that made it through all their editors.”
He noted the “debunking” of the explosive Twitter Files “based on 2 minor errors with acronyms (which, as [investigative journalist Lee Fang] proved, were not, in fact, errors)” and said the “NYT errors are in a different universe.”
Of course all journalists and outlets make minor errors but these are major. No journalist has any business writing about the Snowden reporting if they believe WikiLeaks published it. That’s just massive ignorance that made it through all their editors.https://t.co/H8SPQDz42E
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 14, 2023
The entire liberal corporate media just banded together to proclaim the TwitterFiles debunked based on 2 minor errors with acronyms (which, as @lhfang proved, were not, in fact, errors). These NYT errors are in a different universe.https://t.co/HgGPebaKhx
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 14, 2023
Nearly an hour later, Greenwald reported that The Times executed a “stealth edit” and quietly fixed the “false statements.”
“Just now, the NYT silently deleted its false statements from the article, without bothering to add a correction, an editor’s note or any other indication that this happened,” he tweeted. “Just a stealth edit after these errors were up for more than 12 hours, as if it never happened.”
Just now, the NYT silently deleted its false statements from the article, without bothering to add a correction, an editor’s note or any other indication that this happened.
Just a stealth edit after these errors were up for more than 12 hours, as if it never happened: pic.twitter.com/6GMuFDCBGC
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) April 14, 2023
Readers of Greenwald’s thread may have been disgusted with The Times, but they weren’t a bit surprised by it.
“I really don’t think they care about accuracy anymore, just temporary optics,” replied one Twitter user. “And everyone is so worn out with it, they just let it go. Thanks for the perseverance.”
“They’re like toddlers, Glenn,” wrote another. “You have to encourage them for any step taken in the right direction. You can’t expect them to act like responsible adults and actually to do their jobs. That would be expecting WAY too much. Especially given their ties to the clandestine agencies.”
“That’s why I quit reading NYT 20 years ago!” stated a third.
I really don’t think they care about accuracy anymore, just temporary optics. And everyone is so worn out with it, they just let it go. Thanks for the perseverance.
— Devi (@DeviTheYogi) April 14, 2023
They’re like toddlers, Glenn. You have to encourage them for any step taken in the right direction. You can’t expect them to act like responsible adults and actually to do their jobs. That would be expecting WAY too much. Especially given their ties to the clandestine agencies.
— Robert J. Thomas (@RobertJThomas1) April 14, 2023
That’s why I quit reading NYT 20 years ago!
— Woman-Life-Freedom (@captiveguru) April 14, 2023
Others pointed to the downfalls of digital publishing.
“This is the problem with digital, it’s super easy to just chuck it in the memory hole or remove words that someone finds offensive,” wrote one user. “The neutering/weakening of society.”
This is the problem with digital, it’s super easy to just chuck it in the memory hole or remove words that someone finds offensive.
The neutering/weakening of society.— Steve-O MFG (@Steve_OMFG) April 14, 2023
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- ‘Worse than Afghanistan’: San Francisco mayor asks for $63M to bolster police amid growing crime - June 4, 2023
- Manhattan DA investigator involved in Trump case suspended for contact with Michael Cohen - June 4, 2023
- Woman arrested after hiring hitman through ‘Online Killers Market’ to kill wife of man she met on web - June 4, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.