A resolution supporting Ukraine and calling for an “immediate cease-fire” in the crisis with Russia passed in the House of Representatives almost unanimously.
The opposing lawmakers in the 426-3 vote on Wednesday were all Republicans. Reps. Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Matt Rosendale (Mont.) opted to vote against the seven-page nonbinding resolution which states that the House “stands steadfastly, staunchly, proudly, and fervently behind the Ukrainian people in their fight against the authoritarian Putin regime.”
House votes on resolution in support of Ukraine, which includes a warning to that “it will never recognize or support any illegitimate Russian-controlled leader or government installed through the use of force.”
GOP Reps Paul Gosar, Tom Massie & Matt Rosendale voted against it. pic.twitter.com/4i6lY4UylO— Kristin Wilson (@kristin__wilson) March 2, 2022
In several tweets after the vote, Massie laid out the “many reasons” he could not vote yes on the resolution.
“I fully support the right of the people of Ukraine to self determination,” he tweeted, saying it “contains an open ended call for additional and immediate ‘defensive security assistance.’ This term is so broad that it could include American boots on the ground or, as some of my colleagues have already requested, US enforcement of a no-fly zone.”
He went on to write that the resolution “expands the geographic scope of the US commitment to the conflict in Ukraine by condemning the country of Belarus. We should not be seeking to name new enemies or committing to overturning other governments.”
(3/7) It expands the geographic scope of the US commitment to the conflict in Ukraine by condemning the country of Belarus. We should not be seeking to name new enemies or committing to overturning other governments.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) March 2, 2022
He also cited the Russian people caught up in aggression pushed by their president, Vladimir Putin, and how they would be hurt by “crippling sanctions.”
(5/7) Crippling sanctions could also drive Putin to become more desperate, inciting him to resort to drastic measures such as escalating the weapons employed or the people targeted.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) March 2, 2022
He also noted that “the goal is to de-escalate the conflict” and that the language of the resolution could lead to a “US commitment to forever be actively engaged in a conflict with another nuclear country.”
Gosar agreed, referring to H.Res. 956 as the “Get the US in another expensive War” resolution.
3. I applaud Ukrainian nationalists who want to defend their borders and I truly wish peace and prosperity for that region. HR 956 is a clear path to dragging the US into that conflict. I’m a no.
— Paul Gosar (@DrPaulGosar) March 3, 2022
Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) called out the Republicans in a tweet saying their ‘no’ vote was “unreal” Gosar clapped back.
Talk to me when our border is secure. https://t.co/0OXQ8wQVqo
— Rep. Paul Gosar, DDS (@RepGosar) March 2, 2022
H.Res. 956 calls for the U.S. and its allies “to deliver additional and immediate defensive security assistance to help Ukraine address the armored, airborne, and other threats Ukraine is currently facing from Russian forces.”
It also notes that U.S. lawmakers “will never recognize or support any illegitimate Russian-controlled leader or government installed through the use of force.”
The resolution “declares that the war in Ukraine, a democratic country, is the frontline of democracy and freedom versus authoritarianism represented by Putin’s Russia.”
Writers and editors can be contacted at [email protected] with feedback, tips, or corrections.
Originally from New York, Powers graduated from New York University and eventually made her way to sunny South Florida. Powers also contributes to BizPac Review.
- LA fire chief, with $654,000 annual salary sued by whistleblower who called out her failure to lead - January 15, 2025
- Florida Democrats condemn Biden ‘in the strongest terms’ over shameful parting move - January 15, 2025
- Ivanka Trump gives blunt 3-word response when asked why she won’t return to White House - January 15, 2025
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.