A prominent senator voiced his opposition to the revocation of plea deals for alleged 9/11 terrorists calling the move “deeply disappointing.”
Outliving America’s military presence in Afghanistan, the confessed mastermind behind the deaths of 2,977 victims and counting since Sept. 11, 2001, returned to headlines as the Defense Department struck a pre-trial plea deal that reportedly took the death penalty off the table.
Now, after Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin used his authority to revoke the agreement, Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin (D) used his platform as chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee to call on the administration official to reverse course.
“I urge Secretary Austin to reverse this deeply disappointing decision, which denies finality and justice to 9/11 families,” the senator claimed sharing a report from Reuters, “and exposes yet again the lack of independence that has haunted the military commissions from the outset.”
I urge Secretary Austin to reverse this deeply disappointing decision, which denies finality and justice to 9/11 families and exposes yet again the lack of independence that has haunted the military commissions from the outset. https://t.co/75aFCyhQtq
— Senator Dick Durbin (@SenatorDurbin) August 4, 2024
As had been reported, the DoD initially entered into pre-trial agreements with Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi that would protect the alleged 9/11 terrorists from the death penalty at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, instead setting them up for life sentences.
Amid massive backlash over the announcement, with the court of public opinion enraged that the prisoners hadn’t already been given a fast pass to learn firsthand the truth about their promised 72 virgins, Austin issued a memo Friday that read, “I have determined that, in light of the significance of the decision to enter into pre-trial agreements with the accused in the above-referenced case, responsibility for such a decision should rest with me as the superior convening authority under the Military Commissions Act of 2009.”
“Effective immediately, I hereby withdraw your authority in the above-referenced case to enter into a pre-trial agreement and reserve such authority to myself,” he added, withdrawing from the agreements signed on July 31, 2024.
Prior to Austin’s decision, Durbin tried to sell the agreements as closure for families of the victims while faulting former President George W. Bush’s administration for the use of “untested military commissions.”
“I commend the military prosecutors for finally delivering a small measure of justice and finality to the victims and their loved ones,” he wrote after the deals were reported.
After all these years, the victims of 9/11 and their families deserve justice and closure. The Bush Administration’s disastrous decision to torture detainees and set up untested military commissions made a fair trial impossible. https://t.co/Nx4PasiJ2h
— Senator Dick Durbin (@SenatorDurbin) July 31, 2024
Meanwhile, it was the plea deal itself that left families “disgusted and disappointed.”
Speaking for the 343 firefighters among the first responders who sacrificed their lives that Tuesday morning knowingly running toward the danger, each of those who suffered since and their families, President of the FDNY Uniformed Firefighters Association Andrew Ansbro said in a statement Thursday, “On behalf of New York City firefighters, especially the survivors of the September 11th terrorist attack who are living with the illnesses and injuries that were inflicted upon us that day, we are disgusted and disappointed that these three terrorists were given a plea deal and allowed to escape the ultimate justice while each month three more heroes from the FDNY are dying from World Trade Center illnesses.”
Similar sentiments were shared in response to Durbin’s call to return to the plea deal as demands for real justice rang out.
People need to vote this guy out, he cares more about terrorists than Americans…
— Jake Montoya (@xZOMBIEx79) August 5, 2024
Terrorist sympathizer says what! They deserve the death penalty. Period. They should have been put to death years ago. Liberals love to kill babies but not terrorist!
— Lisa Marie (@lisa_avery31597) August 5, 2024
All due respect sir, I don’t think plea deals will give the families any closure whatsoever.
— Malea J (@mommamalea) August 4, 2024
As someone who actually lost a loved one on 9/11, I’m gonna need you to sit this one out sir…you do not speak for me or my family. The fact that they haven’t already been sentenced to death is frustrating enough.
— Jenn (@PumaSsister) August 5, 2024
If there was EVER a crime for which the death penalty was called for … 9/11 is IT. What the hell is wrong with you. They all actually should have been executed years ago.
— EscapedFromLA (@EscapedFromLA2) August 5, 2024
No! You don’t get to make that disgraceful decision. The families of the first responders and of all the civilians who were murdered that day do. Never forget.
— Denise (@puckandtitania) August 5, 2024
- Georgia shooting suspect’s mom praises son in open letter to victims, insists he’s ‘not a monster’ - September 11, 2024
- Trump says pop diva may ‘pay a price’ for backing Kamala – Megyn Kelly says: ‘FU Taylor Swift!’ - September 11, 2024
- Calls for NYPD commissioner to resign pour in after top aide linked to Chinese Communist Party - September 11, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.