Three pro-abortion insurrectionists — or “protesters,” as the media are calling them — interrupted a Supreme Court hearing Wednesday to voice their displeasure with the court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
“The first protester rose and urged American women to ‘denounce Dobbs’ and ‘remember to vote.’ She was quickly removed from the courtroom by Supreme Court police,” according to SCOTUSblog.
The hearing then continued but was soon interrupted again.
“The right to choose will not be taken away,” another insurrectionist said before urging women to “vote for our right to choose.”
“The third protester stood up a few moments later. Speaking loudly, she exclaimed that ‘we will restore our freedom to choose. Women of America, vote!'” according to SCOTUSblog.
“Each of the protesters put out her hands, presumably to allow police officers to put on handcuffs, and left the courtroom quietly and without any resistance,” SCOTUSblog reported.
Watch all this unfold below:
BREAKING: Just now, several women interrupted oral arguments inside the Supreme Court chamber to denounce Dobbs decision that repealed Roe v Wade! SCOTUS cut off livestream. One woman says “We will restore our freedom to choose! Women of America—Vote!” RT if you stand with them! pic.twitter.com/oDsokXj0jw
— Kai Newkirk (@kai_newkirk) November 2, 2022
The video above was tweeted out by Kai Newkirk, a far-left activist who “pleaded guilty in 2014 to disrupting a Supreme Court argument that year,” according to the Associated Press.
Newkirk and the organization he appears to represent were, it seems, the organizers of the “protest.”
Indeed, in additional tweets Newkirk linked to a fundraising page erected on behalf of the three insurrectionists.
“This morning, November 2nd, three women stood up inside the Supreme Court to denounce the Dobbs decision that repealed Roe v. Wade and called on the women of America to vote to restore the freedom to choose. Emily Paterson, Rolande Baker, and Nikki Enfield did this dignified, nonviolent protest on behalf of the tens of millions of women in America whose right to control their own bodies has been stripped away by the extremist Supreme Court,” the fundraiser reads.
“They were arrested for this courageous act of nonviolent civil disobedience and are being held in jail. Donate here via For All (the organization that anchored the action) to help pay for legal support, including attorneys, fines or fees, return travel to court, and other assistance as these women remain in police custody and face further jail time and fines. Any funds raised beyond those necessary to cover expenses for this action will go to a network of local abortion funds that help support those seeking abortion,” it continues.
UPDATE: The 3 women who peacefully interrupted Supreme Court arguments today to denounce Dobbs and call on women to vote to restore choice are being held in jail + charged w/ misdemeanors.
Support them:
(1) VOTE!
(2) Pitch in to fund their legal support: https://t.co/gCBT9HN90F— Kai Newkirk (@kai_newkirk) November 2, 2022
As noted by the fundraiser, the three were arrested and charged.
“Three individuals were arrested this morning and charged with violation of Title 40 USC § 6134 (making ‘a harangue or oration, or utter[ing] loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building’) and Regulation 5, and with violating 18 USC § 1507 (demonstrating with the intent of interfering with the administration of justice or with the intent of influencing a judge in the discharge of his or her duty),” a Supreme Court spokesperson said in a statement to CNN.
However, critics are demanding they face the exact same draconian treatment that the Jan. 6th rioters — or “insurrectionists,” as the media call them — have faced.
Look:
The October 2nd committee needs to be formed immediately.
— Otphj Benjamin (@Thomas_Kilpat) November 2, 2022
Should they not have been shot like Ashli Babbitt? Insurrection!
— Michael Duffy (@mrduffy3) November 2, 2022
They must all be thrown in jail and held until trial.
— Bob Bradford (@rva_bob) November 2, 2022
Are they in solitary confinement yet?
— TrumpForAll (@DeplorableKimmi) November 2, 2022
Hold them to the same standard
— Nostra, House of Dumbass (@Nostre_damus) November 2, 2022
But that’s unlikely to happen. Just look at the way the media, which critics say is nothing but the propaganda arm of the Biden administration, is treating this story:
- NBC News: “Abortion-rights protesters briefly interrupt Supreme Court”
- USA Today: “Supreme Court arguments interrupted by protesters opposed to abortion ruling”
- CNN: “Women disrupt Supreme Court arguments to protest Dobbs decision”
Protest? Disrupt?
Critics say that going inside the Supreme Court and interrupting a live hearing counts as something far more than just protest. It counts as an insurrection.
Especially when compared to actual protests like the one seen below that occurred outside the Supreme Court this week, not inside it:
UNIVERSITY | Over 40 Yale students joined an intercollegiate delegation on the steps of the nation’s highest court on Monday as justices heard arguments for two cases that could eradicate race-conscious admissions. @anikaaseth https://t.co/S508bUUubd
— Yale Daily News (@yaledailynews) November 1, 2022
“Over 40 Yale students joined an intercollegiate delegation on the steps of the nation’s highest court on Monday as justices heard arguments for two cases that could eradicate race-conscious admissions,” Yale Daily News reported.
“The Yale delegation — which included 41 students drawn from across the University’s four primary cultural activist groups — joined students from at least four other universities to express their support of the practice. Other Yalies, who remained in New Haven, organized on-campus efforts to promote awareness of the hearings,” the student-run outlet added.
While the students were on the wrong side of affirmative action — coming from a conservative perspective, that is — at least they were actual protesters, not insurrectionists.
- NY union leader reveals massive political swing within the ranks: Democrats pushed us to the other side - April 25, 2024
- Former ‘Disinformation Czar’ is back with a new campaign to police speech - April 25, 2024
- ‘Actions… meet consequences’: Woman with heavily tattooed face makes now-viral rant about not getting hired - April 25, 2024
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.