SCOTUS gives Trump a win for SNAP

A loss for judicial activists was a win for President Donald Trump’s administration, as a Supreme Court justice was left stranded on a food stamps decision.

Senate Democrats’ caving wasn’t their only loss after holding government funding hostage for over a month as part of their destructive globalist quest to fund healthcare for illegal aliens. They also took a hit at their preferred battleground of the courts, losing a lawfare fight with Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as the sole dissenter to staying an order on Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefit distribution.

Before the high court took action Tuesday, Jackson temporarily blocked a lower court order to move forward with the payments despite the government shutdown, only to take the opposite position on a decision to extend the temporary stay until Thursday, with none of the jurists explaining their stance.

Prior to the Supreme Court’s intervention, U.S. District Judge John McConnell of Rhode Island, an Obama appointee, ruled that the federal government needed to use a $5 billion contingency fund to cover what amounted to roughly $9 billion in expenses impacting 42 million people benefiting from the program.

“While the President of the United States professes a commitment to helping those it serves, the government’s actions tell a different story,” the judge opined in his ruling before it was stayed by Jackson.

ADVERTISEMENT

Responding to that ruling, the Justice Department stated, “Literally at the eleventh hour, those orders inject the federal courts into the political branches’ closing efforts to end this shutdown.”

“But the answer to this crisis is not for federal courts to reallocate resources without lawful authority,” the DOJ wrote. “The only way to end this crisis–which the Executive is adamant to end–is for Congress to reopen the government.”

The issue of SNAP funding only reached the courts when blue states sued for the benefits, arguing, “Because of the USDA’s actions, SNAP benefits will be delayed for the first time since the program’s inception.”

In opposition to the stay, the states insisted, “Any further stay would prolong that irreparable harm and add to the chaos the government has unleashed, with lasting impacts on the administration of SNAP.”

“The government has offered no defensible justification for that result. The administrative stay should be terminated, and no further stay should be granted,” added the states.

ADVERTISEMENT

During Jackson’s initial stay, administration officials warned states of economic penalties for failing to comply with USDA orders to transmit only partial SNAP payments, amounting to 65%, if full benefits had been provided.

After advancing through the Senate, it remains to be seen whether legislation to fund the government will clear the House as expected before the temporary stay expires Thursday at 11:59 p.m.

Kevin Haggerty

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles