Dem senator schooled on First Amendment after claiming those who ‘espouse hate’ are ‘not protected’

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) is getting a lesson on the Constitution after he falsely claimed during a Senate hearing that those who “espouse hate” online may not be protected by the First Amendment.

His comments came during closing statements on ways a fascist alliance between the private sector and the United States government could regulate free speech on the internet.

“It is incredibly valuable part of our fabric and can be used for good, and we know that it can be used for bad,” Cardin said. “I admire your desire for the private sector to do what’s right. We do hope that’s the case, but I do think there’s a role for government consistent with our First Amendment. For us establishing parameters, if you espouse hate, if you espouse violence, you’re not protected under the First Amendment.”

“I think we can be more aggressive in the way that we handle that type of use of the internet,” the senator continued. “We know that Europe has done things, I think we have to learn things from each other. I hope we can figure out the strategy that we need everybody united on it.”

Twitter was quick to point out the many things wrong with Cardin’s take on inalienable rights.

“Everything that @SenatorCardin says here about the First Amendment is a demonstrable lie,” stated independent journalist Glenn Greenwald. “But this shouldn’t be surprising since a core plank of the Dem Party – not an ancillary one but a core – is state greater censorship of online political speech.”

“There is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment,” noted the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.

“Incorrect,” National Review journalist Claude Thompson stated simply.

Given that the world has now seen via the explosive “Twitter Files” exactly how agents of the government, including the FBI and CIA, have used such subjective terms as “hate speech” to censor and outright ban those on Twitter who dared to contradict the Democrats’ carefully constructed narratives, users online are not keen to allow Sen. Cardin to define what is or isn’t allowed.

“I don’t think it’s Sen. Ben Cardin’s place to decide the boundaries of free speech,” tweeted one user. “That’s for the courts to decide.”

“Well, it’s a good thing we can all agree on what ‘espousing hate’ and ‘espousing violence’ look like!” Pluribus editor Jeryl Bier sarcastically exclaimed.

Still others are calling for the removal of Sen. Cardin from Congress.

[email protected] should be impeached and removed from congress for violating his oath of office and attempting to subvert the constitution,” one user tweeted.


On Thursday, Cardin attempted to defend his comments, stating, “For those interested, here is a longer version of the video referencing hate speech from our recent hearing.”

“Hate speech is protected under the #FirstAmendment, unless it incites violence. #context,” he added.

“I discussed this issue in one of my recent letters to Marylanders on the critical need to publicly stand up to antisemitism, which you can read in full, here,” he said in a follow-up tweet.

The “context” did nothing to bolster his unconstitutional case.

DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE

If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.

Thank you for your donation!
Melissa Fine

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles