Here’s how California suing Trump over National Guard is going to go down

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig has no idea whether the Democrats’ lawsuit against President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard soldiers to Los Angeles will be successful or not.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed the suit on Monday, arguing in a statement that Trump’s order “infringes on Governor [Gavin] Newsom’s role as Commander-in-Chief of the California National Guard and violates the state’s sovereign right to control and have available its National Guard in the absence of a lawful invocation of federal power.”

Appearing on CNN this Monday, Honig noted that despite Trump’s deployment marking the first time a president has federalized the National Guard since 1965, the administration didn’t invoke the Insurrection Act to get it done.

Instead, the administration used 10 U.S. Code § 12406.

“The law that the Trump administration is using to deploy the National Guard says this: It says the president has the power to deploy the National Guard to a state in any of three circumstances,” he noted.

“First of all, if there’s an invasion or a danger of invasion. That’s not in play here. Second of all, if there’s a rebellion or danger of rebellion. Trump did cite that in his order. And then third, a sort of catch-all, if the president is unable, with regular forces, to execute the laws of the United States. Trump cited that as well,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Honig continued by pointing out that Bonta’s lawsuit zeroes in on the language used in the law, 10 U.S. Code § 12406, that Trump invoked. The law specifically says that the federalization of the National Guard “shall be issued through the governors of the States.”

FYI, Trump never did that. He instead directly federalized the force.

(Video Credit: CNN)

“This is what California, in their lawsuit, really seizes on,” Honig said. “So, the main argument California makes in this lawsuit is, ‘Well, this was not issued through the governor, through Gavin Newsom. This was Donald Trump directly to the National Guard.’”

But, he cautioned, Trump may already have a way to bypass this.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Now, I can tell you what the response is gonna be. We haven’t seen it yet, but the Trump administration’s gonna say, ‘That’s just a technicality. It’s really the president’s call,'” the CNN analyst noted.

As a result, he concluded, it’s really hard to tell who’s going to win the case.

“The answer is, we don’t know, because this particular statute has only ever been invoked one prior time in American history,” he explained. “There had been other instances of the Insurrection Act. That’s not what we’re talking about here.”

“This specific law was only invoked once. It was in 1970, and it involved the postal workers’ strike where Richard Nixon deputized the National Guard to deliver the mail. So, a very different scenario. That one didn’t even go to the courts. So, we are really in unknown territory here,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Critics have, for their part, been piling on Bonta and his “frivolous” lawsuit.

“File your stupid lawsuit and waste our tax dollars. You will lose,” one critic tweeted. “This Californian does not support you or the failed governor. You are ruining a once great state.”

See more responses below:

ADVERTISEMENT

Vivek Saxena

Comment

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.

Latest Articles