Former President Donald Trump celebrated the “BIG news out of Pennsylvania” after a court ruled that a no-excuse mail-in voting law was unconstitutional.
The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court struck down the law which was signed by Gov. Tom Wolf (D-PA) in 2019. The panel of three Republicans and two Democrats found that Act 77, allowing residents of Pennsylvania to vote by mail without an excuse, can only stand if it is passed as a constitutional amendment rather than a piece of legislation.
Long a critic of the voting system there, Trump has been very vocal about the problems with the state’s mail-in system which allows voters up to 50 days before an election to cast their ballot via the mail.
“The practice of no-excuse mail-in ballots, put in place by Democrats right before the stolen 2020 Election, has been ruled UNCONSTITUTIONAL by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court,” the former president said in a statement through his political action committee.
Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America pic.twitter.com/glRZVkEIcX
— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) January 29, 2022
“Here is the key question: If widespread mail-in balloting is unconstitutional in Pennsylvania now, how could mail-in balloting have been constitutional in the RIGGED 2020 Presidential Election then?” Trump wondered.
“We all know the answer—it wasn’t! All American Patriots are thanking the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania for having the courage to do the right thing!” he concluded.
The Lawyers Democracy Fund is proud to have supported Bradford County Board of Elections Member Doug McLinko’s litigation challenging Pennsylvania’s no-excuse mail-in ballot law, Act 77, which the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court struck down this morning. https://t.co/NXnbObPJZo
— Lawyers Democracy (@lawyersdf) January 28, 2022
Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt wrote on the Pennsylvania court’s 3-2 decision on Friday:
“No-excuse mail-in voting makes the exercise of the franchise more convenient and has been used four times in the history of Pennsylvania.”
“If presented to the people, a constitutional amendment to end the Article VII, Section 1 requirement of in-person voting is likely to be adopted. But a constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can ‘be placed upon our statute books,'” Leavitt wrote.
Pennsylvania’s Democrat governor has appealed the decision and the law will remain in effect until the Pennsylvania Supreme Court hears the case.
My admin. just appealed and this ruling will not immediately impact mail-in voting.
The GOP-controlled legislature passed Act 77 with bipartisan support, helping millions of voters. Now Republicans want to strip away mail-in voting for a big lie.
We must protect voter freedoms. https://t.co/J90cVXwc9c
— Governor Tom Wolf (@GovernorTomWolf) January 28, 2022
“The Administration will immediately appeal this decision to the state Supreme Court and today’s lower court ruling will have no immediate effect on mail-in voting pending a final decision on the appeal,” Wolf said in a statement after the ruling.
The court’s decision has also sparked some questions about the upcoming 2022 midterm elections.
DONATE TO AMERICAN WIRE
If you are fed up with letting radical big tech execs, phony fact-checkers, tyrannical liberals and a lying mainstream media have unprecedented power over your news please consider making a donation to American Wire News to help us fight them.
- Trump blasts ‘slimeball’ Comcast CEO, says MSNBC needs to ‘pay for their illegal political activity’ - November 29, 2023
- CIA issues new guidelines after agent’s social media posts - November 29, 2023
- Biden just gave Nancy Pelosi a new role - November 29, 2023
Comment
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please click the ∨ icon below and to the right of that comment. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.